ONE TREE HILL
Sir, —T have been reading with great interest the discussion 011 our dear old Ono Tree Hill. I was born and reared round the old Hill and that is now 00 years ago. We never knew of any other trees but the pines 011 the top. If there were puriris they must havo long disappeared. I think these pines should never be interfered with, for the sake of all oldtime settlers, who have greatly treasured the hill and the trees, and One Tree Hill has taken its name from them, or perhaps the puriri before them. So why do new-time folk want to dispose of tlio trees that have made a name for themselves for all times? Tlio trees havo stood the test, have been strong through wind and storm, and if they could only speak could tell many tales (and would wish to remain standing). Ono Tree Hill can be seen for many many miles away and is a well-known old landmark, too beautiful in every way to be altered, either by name or by the destruction of the trees. J, for one, would he very distressed should I hear of any alterations going to take placo in this way. E.A.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19400925.2.109.3
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23770, 25 September 1940, Page 12
Word Count
205ONE TREE HILL New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23770, 25 September 1940, Page 12
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.