RUSSELL CHURCH

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22345, 17 February 1936, Page 12

RUSSELL CHURCH

Si r> —The explanation of what is being sanctioned with regard to the old church at Russell (one of our most treasured places of historical associa-' tion), made by the Diocesan secretary on behalf of "the Standing Committee of the diocese, is not convincing. In any church it is the chancel which sets the tone of the building, gives to the building its essential character. Substitute, in any church, one chancel for another and the whole atmosphere of the place is changed. The whole "feel" of Russell Church will be different if what is now proposed to be done is carried into effect. As a place of historic association it will be as good as obliterated. Whatever else may be altered, the chancel end of Russell Church must be left intact and unaltered. Chvhch Loyeb.

Sir, —The Standing Committee of the Diocese of Auckland does not aim to destroy, but to perpetuate, and is it not better, in order to make the desired memorial permanent—the old rough, decaying building is far from elegant—to rebuild entirely, as opportunity arises, in stone, thus preserving forever the scene of the Proclamation on which "Veritas" ostensibly sets such store. The church at present is an eyesore, inside and out, the local people are apathetic, and it is devolving on the church authorities to attend to the matter —as urgent, the effort is being bravely made. Such letters as that of "Veritas" are not helpful. Would "Veritas" have any objection to the erection of an entirely new historic church if, like the old Nelson Cathedral, which has been built since Russell, the one under discussion was found to be rotteß at the foundation? Wood does not last interminably. Why cling to the old—new times, new customs, do not mean forgetfulness—mere sentiment is a poor substitute for real effort to substantiate historic interest and to make of an old, unbeautiful, decaying barn, for which no architect would stand to-day, a sacred edifice, worthy of presentation—if not already belonging to the nation—is surely commendable. I.W.