Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HARBOUR BRIDGE.

Sir,—Your correspondent, " Ferry Employee," states that one hundred and fifty ferrymen would lose employment should the bridge be erected. This bridge would bring benefits to thousands, but the building of it should not be tolerated for one second on account of the hardship likely to bo experienced by this handful of ferrymen. One recalls the fact that several coach-drivers lost employment through the making of the Otira tunnel and many did likewise in Auckland through the introduction of electric tramcars. Because my father and his father's father used a single-furrow plough I must do the same and not discard it and a pair of worn horses for the tractor and six-furrow implement. It is only right that the minority should rule the majority. Short Sighted.

Sir, —I read with interest "Ferry Employee's" remarks, which are and well worth the consideration of the North Shore residents. Transport by water at a reasonable speed is much cheaper than any of the popular forms of land transport, and is invariably more comfortable and healthful. The Tamaki district is an example which should bo well noted. In addition to the increased fares, the Tamaki bus passengers travelling during peak load hours have to crowd together and many do not get seats; in addition, those standing are jostled at the various bus stops by passengers alighting, added to which the passengers have to endure the aroma of a 35-minute petrol trail in combination with tobacco smoke. Compared with a ferry service, this form of travel is most uncomfortable. Referring to the resolution of the Tamaki Ratepayers' Association, it is hardly possible llio Transport Board will reduce the Tamaki fares; in view of the evidence at the recent transport inquiry, _ the fares would probably advance. In view of the above, a harbour bridge would certainly bring about a large increase in fares. A few of the Tamaki residents have practically discarded the use of the buses, preferring to use a push-bike since the fares were last increased. The result has been most gratifying; a years travelling costs under £2, against £l9 14s by the buses; but the most satisfactory feature is that we enjoy better health than formerly, do not easily take colds, iind always'have a reserved seat at any time. Tam of Tamaki.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19290524.2.156.2

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20263, 24 May 1929, Page 14

Word Count
380

HARBOUR BRIDGE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20263, 24 May 1929, Page 14

HARBOUR BRIDGE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVI, Issue 20263, 24 May 1929, Page 14