IMPORTED COCKSFOOT.
gi r> It was with more than surprise that 'i read the statements made by responsible men in Thursday's and rriday s Herald that Danish cocksfoot was as good as, or better than, the Akaroa article, especially as far as Auckland district is concerned. I have tried the two seeds side by side and found that, although the germination of Danish is decidedly better than that of Akaroa, yet the foliage of Akaroa is far superior to Danish, there being much more leaf and far greater spreading tendency and less seed shoots in ,the Akaroa. This is also the experience of some of my neighbours, who have tried these seeds in different paddocks. When visiting Ruakura Experimental Farm three years ago we were shown grass grown from Akaroa and Danish 'seed, set in rows side by side, and there was no comparison between them. The Akaroa was growing big, spreading bunches, while the Danish had the appearance of standing straight up, with narrow leaves, more like tufts o nishes We were told that the seeding habit, of the Danish was brought about by the fact that, in Denmark cocksfoot was grown in rows, with iniercultivation, for seed purposes onlv and that plants that did not seed freelv were at 6nce eradicated. Pukekawa. H. A. Hawkb.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19280528.2.166.3
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 19957, 28 May 1928, Page 12
Word Count
217IMPORTED COCKSFOOT. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXV, Issue 19957, 28 May 1928, Page 12
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.