DISPUTED. AGREEMENT.

New Zealand Herald, Volume LVI, Issue 17234, 9 August 1919, Page 12

DISPUTED. AGREEMENT.

";;.SU?I?EME COURT E.TJLIS?CS''S<HJaHT : ' ".' r ; An originating summons for. interpreta■■;■•■'tion of an agreement'-wan heard by Mr. ' ;'■■ justice ' Chapman, in th» 'Ba.pre&e'};;©B!3rt ■•;/|.«»tepcfey, : iuftfasar E-«es?. . paa, «s&-le*see. ' I® Everybody's Theatre ?•'£&!■;' BCT&jrtt), ; ' uan thfi-'plaratiffi aad^e^Sfew : ;2«»land '. ~.■::" Kcturiß Supplied .Limited ':&te."'• Ostler}. ?.- "- ' fife defendants. ' Mr. IJiafcait : f^ge&red ■%». the <iaieiy Thaatoev '. . "";. .risMcis feat! bf<saf«eiT®fi:. f^l ,&,' tmilVWw.Ttf , : " lie F«icts were ths& fat 35315 the. oafe|y ' t&jafcre, Liiaifed, which "f»*s ,ihs \'sr<»- . prister of Everybody's Ttefcre, "watered k'ta an agreement w&lsfe tha*'-JlSew Zss«> '."' "'■ v .Bud Picture S«ppU«M^-;. Linsiilied,-„ ; ■■'■, \)» _ assuagement of the theatre *ra» '. ■' handed over to, the !as.ter «siwjp9»y« - Ail fi.mis.-4ffir a period of 'Sue -yssarte were -'to ! be obtained was .the "■Wtgr SSealaad Pie* : ; tar® provide^ that,', th* Gaiety,i Xbeaire v , Limited* should' ao'.YlQßir eon- ■; " tloa*. as' " theatre: p-wariefearat " :df%?ery*.' ; body's Theatre, ;Lass year, -this'gaiety ! Company sub-let : ihe theatre to the plain- 1 US, Oae, who •ga'ffi' feh«i comp^y^"'is|.'i 3 demnity agauuJL any liability under the! . agreement. The que!#^s>t& : be decided I ' was whether the agreement was' brought »* to an end by the sublease, ..or whether I' i* was still 03 forte. ■. Decision -'"wan ■*&■ y served. ... ■-.■.■■ ■' .."'. ■■..., <. r . *■.!;