Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

THAT ARCH. TO THE EDITOR. Sir,—lt was doubtless with the best intentions that Mr. Napier, M.U.K., requested the. Government to hand over the Queen-street arch to the citisceus of Auckland so that it might be pulled down and re-erected at the entrance to Freeman's Bay Park. Now we are informed that the Cabinet has solemnly sat down to Consider the matter. Oh, what rubbish ! Why, if the meretricious "structure were put up for sale by auction to-morrow, no man in his senses would offer £5 for it. Just imagine, sir. the cost of pulling down and the cost of re-erection. I say, sir. let the Cabinet pull it down, keep it and ship it to their beloved Wellington. It would perhaps be considered ornamental there: it has impeded the traffic in Queen-street long enough. But supposing that the citizens of Auckland are mean enough to accept it, who will pay for the pulling down and re-erection in the face of the fact that it would be rotten before Freeman's Ray Park can be opened to receive visitors V "The Cabinet is considering." Oh, it is too absurd, too ridiculous, too funny. "The Cabinet," of what class of timber is it constructed '[— I am, etc.. J. O'Mbaghbk. Auckland, June 25, 1901.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19010627.2.11

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11690, 27 June 1901, Page 3

Word Count
211

CORRESPONDENCE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11690, 27 June 1901, Page 3

CORRESPONDENCE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11690, 27 June 1901, Page 3