DUN IN DIVORCE CASES.
[by telegraph.—press association.] Ddnedin, Wednesday. In the Divorce Court, the case of Wolff v. Wolff and Dr. Ross was called, and the rule was made absolute. In Wood v. Wood and Farquharson a decree nisi was granted. The case of Williams v. Williams and Hands was adjourned till next sitting to enable evidence to be taken in Victoria.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18880621.2.26
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXV, Issue 9086, 21 June 1888, Page 5
Word Count
62DUN IN DIVORCE CASES. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXV, Issue 9086, 21 June 1888, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.