Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ELECTRIC LIGHT AT LYTTELTON.

[BY TELEGRAM!. —I'KESS ASSOCIATION - . 1 Cukistchdrcii, Thursday. The Harbour Board's reasons for! rejecting the electric light are as follows That the New Zealand Electric L'ght Company have iipt carricd out the Arrangement of " January 27th, in micli.a'manner as to enable them to. rlcjuire thW Board to. pay the contract price., and Accept, delivery of " installation " in its: present, "condition ;■ that. .the company have, not attempted to prove the-'.'lights;erected, are of two thousand candlc power ; tbrt the workmanship' arid' material have, not been., uniformly first-class .quality. It,is admitted that the cost of the sixteen; lights is some-' what below four pence per hour, excluiiive.;of ■interest on theicost or; depreciation, of plant.The Board recognised the necessity for lighting the harbour - thoroughly, and; „aru.' prepared to negotiate with -any • company for lighting either, by «l«ctricty or otherwise..: :

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18830928.2.27

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XX, Issue 6822, 28 September 1883, Page 5

Word Count
139

THE ELECTRIC LIGHT AT LYTTELTON. New Zealand Herald, Volume XX, Issue 6822, 28 September 1883, Page 5

THE ELECTRIC LIGHT AT LYTTELTON. New Zealand Herald, Volume XX, Issue 6822, 28 September 1883, Page 5