Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE COURT.—Monday.

" ' [Before B. C. Barstow, Esq.. fill.] Dkuxkenness.—One individual, fora first . offence, and two for second offeDces of thin character, were punished aa usual by fine or imprisonment. ■ . Labcexy.—George .Littlewood again appeared on remand, charged with the larceny of a gold watch and chain, valued at: £18, ,the property of A. Gill. Inspector Broham asked that thechargemight.be withdrawn, as the evidence obtained -was insufficient to ensure a conviction. Withdrawn accordingly.— ■Edward Cam was charged with the larceny of a number of articles of wearing apparel, valued at 30s, the. property of William .Staunton; of Auckland. 'Inspector Broham asked for a remand until Thursday. There were several other charges of a like description which'the police hoped to sheej home to the prisoner. Remanded accordingly.; Indecent, Assault.—William Donaldson, ancl ■ David and James Mollmoyle, ; were -Charged'withcommitting an indecent assault "upon Janet;Price,'atiAu'ckland/ , on the 2Sth instant. On ot.lnspector Broham, the particulars of the

offence were very bad, this case was remanded till Thursday, prisoners being admitted to

of IESU each. ~ r: TTNRTn.y~:ArJKREXTiCES.-T-George Howard,' -AKred-Robinson, William Whiteside, and' Michael Mulvaney, apprentices of Mri Parker, boot manufacfifrerj' were brought up by their roaster charges o£ msub' ordination. 'Thetlefendants were tried separately, and each pleaded not guilty in turn; "TEeeaseidf Alfred Robinson was' first heard! The JadiTirasxhargedrwith-niaHngvUse of bad language. Mr../JBrock appeared for the prosecution. T - -Mr., Taylor, foreman in Mr. Parker's _.establishment, proved the pharge/Tand ;Mr. Parker J>ut in the boy's indentures. . His Worship found him guilty, but. deferred passing.sentence until the others had been heard.-rrA similar course was then pursued in the cases of George Howard, William' Whiteside, ■ and Michael Mulvaney. Howard was charged with usin°; threatening language to.Jihe foreman, and calling him names, Whiteside with making use of a blasphemous expression, stating that unless he was paid overtime he would " loaf" the next week,, and Mulvaney with using threatening language, aud singing highly indecent'songs. It was stated in the evidence that Howard had been a good boy up till a 'fortnight previously,; when the contaminating influence of his companions seemed to take? effect upon him. His ! Worship, after . some deliberation, sentenced' Mulvaney to forty-eight hours' solitary confinement, and to pay his share of the costs of the-case,'26s. Gdj Whites.de to twenty-four : hours' solitary confinement, and to'pay 2Gs 6d. In consideration of their ! youth, Howard and<:Robinson- were\ discharged, after being ordered to contribute their share of the costs, 26s 6d each. His. Worship stated that i{ the lads came before him again charged with a similar offence, he should sentence each of them to one month's imprisonment -with jard labour, besides ordering a flogging to be administered by one of the warders of the gaol.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18760328.2.25

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XIII, Issue 4484, 28 March 1876, Page 3

Word Count
441

POLICE COURT.—Monday. New Zealand Herald, Volume XIII, Issue 4484, 28 March 1876, Page 3

POLICE COURT.—Monday. New Zealand Herald, Volume XIII, Issue 4484, 28 March 1876, Page 3