THE CHARGE OF MURDER AGAINST JOHN CLARK.
(Kroni the SiMneij Kvmlu.j News, Aug. 1(!.) John Ci.abk, who on l-Yiday «< arrainucd and pleaded not guilty to an indictment. *'!i:irniii« him with liuviiif; on the lind August. lN(>:i, killed and murdered one Susan Clark, was'placed in the (took. Mr. Windever, instructed In .Mr. 14. li. Smith, appeared lor the prisoner. Sir William Mannini; (Attorncy-Conei-al) appeared on hehalf of the Crown'. Mr. Windeyor applied to his Honor lora postponement of tin- trial, lie stated that the prisoner was on last S.itimlav week i-onimitted for t rial hv the Coroner lon a charge of manslaughter. On the following Wed- | nesdav he was brought up al the I'oliee Court on a ; charge of murder : evidi-nee was taken, hut the case ; was not earrii-d through. 'I'll.- prisoner's attorney lias therefore not had time to prepare I he prisoner's defence seeing that the prisoner did not know what course was to betaken in Ihe matter. The learned eounsel.[noted from the atlidavit of Mr. K. 1!. Smith, prisoner's attorney. Matin* that he helieves I'-e trial of the ease a-ii.i-t the prisoner at the pre.-ent sitting- of the Court would he prejudicial to the prisoner's fair trial. 'I'hr excitement of t-l-e puhlii- mind at the present time would soon he injurious to the prisoner. .Mr. Wiudeyer produeed n copy of Hie I'oliee News appended to tiie aflidavit. In this abominable publical ion t here was an article, publi-hed on the 7th instant, wliieli ass-iiu.- (hat a verdict of guilt > of wilful murder w.mld he relnr-ied l,v the coroner's jurv. The article was h.-idi-d ■■ lufiil'Murd. r of .Mrs. Clark," and all through treat e,l the ea>e as one ~f murder, and this while Hi.- ehai-.-e ».-,s K-ing im e-l igalcd. This was eal.-iilaled to prejudice a fair trial of the prisoner. lie (Mr. Wi-dewr' could not see why the ease should not he p.,-! the prisoner eould not get :I».-1V. he would ofe..ur-e he kepi in euslodv. and the wilne--es wen- all r.-sidenl in and 'not likdv ;to go away. In the .u-e of licrlr..nd an applieatio'n tor a poMponement wa- uraiKed on the ground of popular ev.-itenient. and why should not the present application hn granted on the same ground. Was th.-re a desire t>. push this case forward hceau-c public excitement prevailed? He j (Mr. Wvi-.devci-i. apart tV.-m the reas.-ns h:. had nliva.lv yiyei'i. was' n,.t prepared to defend the ' pri-oner. lie felt app:d!e.l at th.- tl ght tin! he J should he called upon M uiidermke th- defence of the pri-oner. ejar-cd at he * .is with an otl'ence which iny..lved the p.— i'u'.its , Y h> . !.-at I:, without proper |>re;iarati.m. It :na hr s-ii.l that he »a- pu-scn: at w-telil! ase on his behalf to s, v tj, : .t n,,ihii : - shoul.l !.•■ i-.tr.. ; iue,-d a-.in-, lu,,i in ei id.ai. •• that ..u-hl ...o: to i-.-. il- !: -A It. ll Mn - in-! rue!,- 1 that tin- pris i;,r. wli :• touii-. iveciv,- 1 a vioh-ut fall f'rom a h..r-e. and ,ii,.v" he 'had I.e. n si.! jee: to tits of excltemc:::. If v.oll! I '~• ■;,: ri 'I . IflVc time .•i'.e.-.e ! ii, ~,•.!..• t.- :,.ak.- su:i;eienl i'n.piii-i.-, i:i ivleroMce to the pi-i-e,,.,-. ~;.j,-l, ~11-hl result i-! iv.111.-ill* tills ,-:•■■■ H- .-f th.-' !M-i -~!.. .- fr.cii . ■.:.■ ■■( -::n.- lev 1 . 'h:it ..f .',■,„-! . ~.),!. -. ' He i: -p.-d io- I!.. -I' w...;;d s,-e :'.:.• ■. a- ■!i-ii.let-.,-- .-f iiis -io|.li.-.,-:o.i and it. s'l- vV-Minm Mannn.-. i •'. ~n.„.-„_• the a'.|,i.e-i:i.-n. Ma:.-.i lh ,- he hel.eie.; :.. .';,e a la:'- Hial'dc!a\ wa~ ■ ; ie !il-t ■ ■ el.-.-.1.-,- ~f -iCChlelO- .1,. !e,,| : U -\ ~,U ! ; Ms .. ,e , ; - ..I M-,-..-,. »;,.. «... e ~„.,,,:.,-.! a. ihc .-!.-. ■;' :-.- ■ ■-: -.;i-m;- ~r ,l,e r--,,,, U al C..n:-,. a.id ■■-.-.< .-!..■ ■<' ■■„■ m-ivnal uitii,. «a- aw iy The ■',■- : !'. : ■-. T. ■• iv:,...:, ~. I'.c ci-.-'h.,-',.,,-,,...! lit. I' I lie ( 'el,, .Mi I'm! ee C...,',-! were Hi, -c : On 'a-'. M.- d-u ; i- la;.- Mi- r!.,-V- far- ; c- wei.r i.. ; ..,::-! -t-l- i 1 , -.,' :,e !.-l I cerlail- .P!..-!M: 1. ■•. ;i,r ..-, >'|.- ase. lie ;....k ■~- -1:,.,- .„-,, ,1.,w. : . I.;. . !, ...vler iha- 'he I ri- •■■. :■ i,o-hl !::,«•■ an . .p;.. .rt ie ut v ..f ':.■:! !!::■' -:at- lilrl.l. lie c.1.,-,-.. Ci.o-iv t-i he •. e.. ■ 1 1; : 11 -'a .:. n a ~ and iv!.ii:un- ii .' ~ , i.|,-. T.e :,i;.l:n.'., ..f the learne.l e■... ,-•!. lhal pri- •!• laid iveem-d a fall, and -in.v that lime «:,. 5.d.:.-- ' ~■■..-Hah•!(:-. w.,. ~:■ , .-• ■..;;■ lie. how.■\ei-. agreed Htth hi, hvir-ed frie-id t hat the paper ].-.. 111.-e i 'II < '-. I'M .•■.tllal'le.i a 1,-n . .l.|ee: j, ,nal,|e ar. !■•;.■. r,,,s ~; 1, .e- ,- ~uhli-!,el e\e, v Saturday tamed an arii.-ie whidi assumed that he had' I ~ f..und -<■:!:> of :uur.l. :-. T'i,- ~T i article Ha-eir-ulat..:' in th.• iurv r.-om ninie the ease was yoiui; on at the ( ■..n.i . t..ur;. »!,-. iv.i- :he ien I let of the jur\ nas n..i d.-liiered till thu -ameni U 'hi. al In ..V1...-L Ti.is iia- M..:. h.. »,•».•!■. a -elf.-.nlleienily Mron- ~h|ec:i,,n on which 10-ran! a p..-i pon.-meiit ..('the trial. In l! :,.,■ ~f |!,n ,-,, id. p. .pillar feelin' Ha- e\c,,,,l u, ,;, i,,:ch all ,ncr iae . olom" In II a-e of llowll and Kai:-i. a p. •-• p.-n.-neut niiu'hi Inn.' he". a-k.-.i for. ..,1 Ihe H.at an artiele hal i»vi, pnl.li-h.-d in a !ai-e journal j.rejndical 1., the pn-..ner>. In that ca-e he thou-hl there would he a u'lvater rcaswi, win a postpoin-mi-iit oiiahl to haw heen canted. Tii'e //.y.iA/ w:i-a lar»e journal, and eireuhited the m o>t re.speetahle class ~f , ill/, n<. while the /■.;■.■ Xr:s recen.,l „- 5,,,,,,,,,., ,>,,„, ,;,, ,„„.,.,. elas-e- and person, of low laM.- and he was conlldent that r.-pectahle jnrvmen w.,ii!.l ~..t he i :i lluenecd in the least In ainthuii; which appeared in the /V.W .\fW\. Mr. Wiudeycr having replied. His Houor'siii.l lie was ~f ..pinion that this e ; me ..usht not to he hurried on will, .-uch <-clcritv. In -rantinu postponement-, th.. ,pn-t ion rested efitirelv on the circumstances siirii.tiiidiiis/ the case. In t lie ease'if ll.ivell and Knnni. sevcnil of the witiieis,..s in eross-ciauiiimtiou were asked if tlier had wn J)r Stecl'.-t letter, anil t hey -laid tbev had not'; and although the Court liinl expressed it's disiipprobalion yf the conduct of the proprietors of the llrrnhl and Dr. Steel, he (his Honor) was of opinion tint the jurymen inthrei...- were not influenced in their decision an'atom hy Dr. Steel's letter. 1 n this ca-e however, popular eieiteir.eut was hij.li, the srtiele eoMtained in the paper iittaehoil to tin* iilli.hivits was unwarrantable in its remarks, and !ls hr helieved that the Crown would sustain no injury hv the J>ostponemrnt .if the cmse he granted the application. The witnesiM in thi« ito wer • then boinul over to appear at the next niltinj: of the Court on the 15th Norember, and the jeiisoner was remanded to gaol.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18690826.2.26
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume VI, Issue 1753, 26 August 1869, Page 5
Word Count
1,091THE CHARGE OF MURDER AGAINST JOHN CLARK. New Zealand Herald, Volume VI, Issue 1753, 26 August 1869, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.