Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REASON FOR OPPOSITION

(To the Editor)

Sir,—l should be much obliged if you would give me a little space to explain a matter which as reported in your report of the last meeting of the (City Council would appear a futile and groundless piece of opposition oil my part. The report reads, and quite rightly,, that I dissented to the appointment of certain well known citizens as trustees for the Gas Works _ Sinking Fund. I did not dissent to their appointment, but I considered that as the Manager of the Bank pf New Zealand for the time being was one of the City Sinking Fund Commissioners he ought, in order to ensure continuity of policy, be one of the trustees for the new Sinking. Fund. The Council did not agree with me and that was why I requested to be recorded as dissenting, but my dissent was merely limited to this, not to the appointment of new trustees as mentioned.—l am, etc..

STEPHEN H. MOYNAGH, Nelson, 16th June.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19300616.2.23

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIV, 16 June 1930, Page 2

Word Count
168

REASON FOR OPPOSITION Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIV, 16 June 1930, Page 2

REASON FOR OPPOSITION Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIV, 16 June 1930, Page 2