Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PECULIAR CASE

(United Press Association.) INVERCARGILL, Feb. 20. A peculiar ease was heard by Mr Cruiekshank, S.M., today, when a cycle agent and repairer was charged with carrying bn the business of a second-hand dealer without a license. The case was concerned with a stolen bicycle, which had been purchased by the defendant in the course of his business from a man wfio gave a fictitious address. The police eontende'd that the per-son-who did any second-hand dealing besides his own business was within the Act and required a license. For the defence it was argued that isolated purchases of second-hand mabhines did not bring the cycle agent within the definition of a second-hand dealer. If that were so every man who ac cepted second-hand articles in part payment for a new one would require a license. The defendant had never before purchased a bicycle from people he did not know personally,- and in this case had taken the name and address of the vendor. The decision was reserved.. ",

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19200221.2.32

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LIV, Issue LIV, 21 February 1920, Page 5

Word Count
168

PECULIAR CASE Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LIV, Issue LIV, 21 February 1920, Page 5

PECULIAR CASE Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LIV, Issue LIV, 21 February 1920, Page 5