Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUCKLAND V SYDNEY.

THi mm OF NAVAL BASE. NOT TAKEN KINDLY IN AUSTRALIA. (Press Association. —Copyright.) (iiteceived 9.45 a.m.) SYDNEY,■ This Day. The thirisfer of the. Naval ba£e to Auckland means a trade loss to Sydiley of £BO,OOO to £IOO,OOO atlnuftUy, Mr Kitchen, managing director of the Sydiley Soap and Candle Company, suggests as a remedy that the Commonwealth Government approach the Imperial authorities with a proposal to jointly appoint a victualling officel might act on behalf of both, buying for the Imperial and Australian fleet vessels. Then there would be a chance of competing against New Zealand. "If," (says Mr Kitchen) "New Zealand can supply goods at a lower price than Australia, then good luck to her; but the odds are we should keep most of the trade we have had before."

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19120712.2.37

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XLVII, Issue XLVII, 12 July 1912, Page 5

Word Count
133

AUCKLAND V SYDNEY. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XLVII, Issue XLVII, 12 July 1912, Page 5

AUCKLAND V SYDNEY. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XLVII, Issue XLVII, 12 July 1912, Page 5