CORRESPONDENCE.

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XXV, Issue 132, 5 June 1891, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE.

Tqx^.Eit^^^^^vfeil^^!!^^;^ Biß~fc 'should like to'Jiay a•&*&&}%£•;'■-IU with Mir TarraHt, Bh»l^! iJ-Ss^l the reason why me^ddinglhe flamea&pttnt»f.-;%1 of work'Aiß;.«y;6-ilea>^re;B9^i|U»li~ fa^ri|£Bi;*p^idj'' f <;-' f's^ As. for Mr Shephard Baylng.: that'ft:fflmiii^frr'< { v-' teaoher has n6t a hij^nd and faim{ly~tb^ • ■--'* provide) for, what Has that to dowltlvtne • Education Board ? Do they pay the teacher.''■•■'& in aooor.iaooe with his work, or to accord* V anoe with how many are dependent on hlni' -• / for a living? Again, female!fawnera very' , often have more work to do than male' teaohersj take for instance two miked conn-: try sohools where the ;teabter sna?noiK6lp^ In one of these there is a male teaoher, fix the other a female, Now the female feaoher is supposed to teaoh needlework, but. of course, needlework is not'expeoted imtha other school. Now whioh teaoheV aowifil moat work i And yet oao rewires so muoh more salary than the other. For my pact I think it a great shame that women should be ground down so in the way of wages, ' 1am,4i0., „. . .T '" Justiob, BJohmond,Junei,, , .„• , „.,.,., <v.vl.,' >■ '■ — .■ ' ■•'■■ ■-'-••-•■: '"••'■