Further Information On Workers' Compensation

Northern Advocate, 18 May 1949, Page 4

Further Information On Workers' Compensation

Alleged anomalies in the newlyannounced premiums for workers’ compensation established under the recently-instituted state monopoly were discussed at last night’s meeting of the Whangarei Chamber of Commerce.

A report which appeared in the Northern Advocate, in which it was stated that some premiums had been raised, was produced by Mr H. M. May.

“Apparently the premium has been raised 100 per cent in some cases,” he commented.

The president (Mr K. Haslett) said that was not true in all cases—premiums covering his own business had been lowered.

“The report states that small companies with a small staff will benefit," remarked the secretary (Mr J. R. McIlraith). UNLIMITED COVER »

Mr May: “That-may be so, but the general scale is apparently up 100 per cent.

“I think it is up to us to protest against this imposition. “Some premiums have been * raised to £5 from £2.” Mr W. L. McKinnon said that the chamber should obtain the list of charges before making any protest. The secretary commented that any representations made in Whangarei would have little effect, as the premiums were obviously a matter of higher Government policy. Mr T. Busck: “I understand that, under common law. the Government is liable for an unlimited cover instead of the limited cover provided by private insurance companies. “Perhaps that is the reason for the higher premiums.” The case of the Nelson Harbour Board was quoted, members saying that the board, which formerly insured with the Government under the voluntary system, was now under the compulsory system and was paying 'double its former rates. SOME DECREASES Mr May: “That’s what monopoly does.” It was decided to obtain a copy of the new premium rates. * Mr J. F. Johnson then suggested that the executive of the New Zealand Associated Chambers of Commerce might be asked for its opinion on the question. Supporting this, Mr May again quoted the Advocate report, in which it was stated that the Whangarei Hospital Board’s premium would be £347 against the old premium of £l7l. Mr Haslett: “That is only one case. “Around this table are three or four t>f us who have found that our insurance rates have been decreased.” “Are we interested in local bodies or are we interested in business firms?” asked Mr McKinnon. “I think we should obtain the necessary information before writing to the executive." This course was decided on.