CONVERTS TO PREFERENCE.
Press Association.—Copyright. London, May 6. Messrs W. Hayes Fisher and R. A. Yerburgh, who were among the followers of Sir Michael Hicks-Beach in urging in 1903 the need of cartious enquiry and resolutely objected to protective taxation on imports of food, now write to the Times that the preferential case submitted to the Imperial Conference lias so far strongly impressed them that they preferred to recognise ;that a moderate corn duty would not infringe the sacred principles and may be an instrument of the greatest Imperial unity. The Times, in a special article on the preference debate at the Imperial Conference, says Mr Asquith's tone was frankly that of a local particularist prepared to consider practical proposals for the improvement of the channels of inter-Imperial trade, but apparently he does not realise it is the duty of the country rejecting proposals whereon all others are agreed to formulate counter proposals. Lord Stanlefy, a Unionist freetrader, joins Messrs Yerburgh and Fisher ou the question of preference.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19070508.2.7
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Times, Volume LXIV, Issue 106, 8 May 1907, Page 2
Word Count
168CONVERTS TO PREFERENCE. Manawatu Times, Volume LXIV, Issue 106, 8 May 1907, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Manawatu Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.