Supreme Court.
{Por Press Asso nation.
, JTuekb, Thursday. in the civil suit. Hood t. Wenlev and Lanauze, the Chief Justice nonsuited the plaintiff, holding that no negligence was disclosed and that proper notice had not beeneiren as provided k the employers Lisbility Act. In the disputed land titte case. Tata Hapiania v. Henry U'iS'eill, David Edward O I«eil and the Solicitor-General, ?,, ca'm f<> hare a title, of defendants to 10 1W acres in the Taramsrama survey district set wide, the Chi,<f JusHce enlewd a non-suit with costs on the highest scale, n
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19020919.2.23
Bibliographic details
Manawatu Standard, Issue 7403, 19 September 1902, Page 2
Word Count
92Supreme Court. Manawatu Standard, Issue 7403, 19 September 1902, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.