WARDEN'S COURT—October 10.
(Before JL W. Robinson, Esq., Wavden.) Philip Sullivan v. W. Moeller. —This was an application for the dissolution of the mining partnership on the ground that defendant did not do a fair share of the work, and.piad absented himself from the claim on the 7th and Bth inst. 'without providing a substitute to represent; him during ais absence, in consequence of which complainant had suffered, and was still suffering, loss. The complainant said that he had nothing to cotnolain of in defendant's work if lie would only work when wanted, but that he was, when lie had the means, in the habit of getting on the spree, and leaving him, as on the last occasion, in the lurch, and that therefore he had no confidence in him/ The Warden said that he saw the hardship of Sullivan's case, but suggested that be should give defendant, who is an elderly man, another ■tri;l. He would, adjourn the further hearing of the complaint until to-mor-row, and if by that time the defendant went to work, and paid complainant £2los. for lost time he should consider the matter settled, if otherwise complainant could appear at the Court tomorrow and prosecute the complaint, when the Court would be prepared to make an order.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18721011.2.15
Bibliographic details
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 189, 11 October 1872, Page 5
Word Count
212WARDEN'S COURT—October 10. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume III, Issue 189, 11 October 1872, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.