Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A TRADE UNION CASE.

DAMAGES CLAIMED FOR BOY

COTTING.

VERDICT FOR DEFENDANTS.

Press A ssociaHon. Electric Telegraph .

Copyright.

Melijouhne, May 22,

Tn the action Martell against the Miners' Union, a claim for £1000 for loss of employment, a verdict was returned for the defendants. The Judge was of opinion that a combination of the strength of the union for the exclusion of certain persons was not an illegal act. [The union refused to admit Martell as a member, and the miners declined to work with him, so the colliery company was compelled to dispense with his services. Thereupon ho brought an action against the union for damage?.] _____

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19030523.2.26

Bibliographic details

Marlborough Express, Volume XXXVII, Issue 120, 23 May 1903, Page 3

Word Count
107

A TRADE UNION CASE. Marlborough Express, Volume XXXVII, Issue 120, 23 May 1903, Page 3

A TRADE UNION CASE. Marlborough Express, Volume XXXVII, Issue 120, 23 May 1903, Page 3