Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FISH V. HUMAN FOOD.

o«« JWTO® OF TUB LYTTELTON TIMES. J 0 •~-May I ask, through the medium of wHid /' !l P er > w hosc duty it is to inspect the food > 9 * n our streets for human

Hie/?' 7 ccr * a m knowledge, a member of the thi s “ ree waß some time since asked whether repij C( i ? ca ® e under their province. Having Jjj, n r ln the affirmative, reasons were given tance * tr lng a q ue »tion of such vital imports Bell’ sen .* ; tbe person supposed to „ art ' eb) referred to, which was Was food ; but nothing further Now i the matternot nrenT le ! h ® r tbo P obco did his duty lam u to , Ba y> but l a m persuaded that soon in g sbo “li ( ? C2r tainly be done, and that c °nßcon(.n Pr ° r ldlng a P re7e ntative from fatal •sequences from this cause, xour obedient servant, VIGILANT.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18730825.2.18.3

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume XL, Issue 3926, 25 August 1873, Page 3

Word Count
158

FISH V. HUMAN FOOD. Lyttelton Times, Volume XL, Issue 3926, 25 August 1873, Page 3

FISH V. HUMAN FOOD. Lyttelton Times, Volume XL, Issue 3926, 25 August 1873, Page 3