Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A REPLY FROM AUSTRALIA

Mr McLeod sai' that Mr E'ndean, wlioge name had been mentioned in | som e newspaper accounts, took no part in organising the deputation to Mr Forbes, but his anxiety for the primary producers and the epunti'vp tgenerHlv imde r the present- .denlopable conditions was well known. Mr McLeod d'flclceed that on Wmlnnsdav, h'sfc the member for Parnell the fo] lowiny cablegram to the f general manager of one of the I'nrgest. importing as wen as manufacturing firms in the Gom.monwft'dt.) •—“Has high rate exchange been to the benefit of Aivtmlia 5 " The replv was as follows:—“Definpelv | yes. Initial immediate benefit to export ‘ producer ultimately reflected in stabilised price levels and increased spending power. General benefits of h'eb exchange mow recognised. Difference of opinion now onlv whether present rate should be increased ’’

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321121.2.75

Bibliographic details

Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1932, Page 6

Word Count
135

A REPLY FROM AUSTRALIA Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1932, Page 6

A REPLY FROM AUSTRALIA Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1932, Page 6