PEN IN HAND
Is your signature legible? A timely complaint comes from the Duke of Westminster on the discourtesy of correspondence that does not enable the receiver of a letter to know whether it comes from man, woman, child or firm. A Duke of Hamilton once had this brought home to him in a most commercial manner. As peers of the realm sign only their surnames, and he possessed three dukedoms—Hamilton, Chatelherault and Brandon—he had the habit of signing “Hamilton, Chat and Bran,” so it was not surprising that he received a letter from a firm of wine merchants using those names, with the title “Messrs.’’ before them. However, it is seldom that illegibility is put to such use as when an actor, dismissed by Sir Henry Irving, and realising that of the whole communication, only the signature was legible, used it as a free pass to the Lyseum Theatre for years!
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19360316.2.103.5
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXVI, Issue 80, 16 March 1936, Page 10
Word Count
152PEN IN HAND Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXVI, Issue 80, 16 March 1936, Page 10
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.