SOCIAL CREDIT.
(To the Editor.) Sir, —“Anti-D.S.C.” is like most of the opponents of Social Credit they abuse the Douglasites, but bring forward no case against the proposals. Evidently they forget abuse is no argument. Why do they not bring forward the points that they think are the failings of the reform? Do they think that Social Credit is a fallacy because Bill Smith says it is (many do) or have they found a flaw, I suggest to “Anti-D.S.C.” that it is his duty to expose any proven fault in the proposals and bring those flaws to the notice of the movement so that they can be rectified, and not allow them to bo found out when Social Credit is an established fact. If not, then they should refrain from sneering at what they cannot achieve themselves. I am etc.,
NOT LESS FOR SOME, BUT MORE FOR ALL.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19350423.2.3.5
Bibliographic details
Hawera Star, Volume LIV, 23 April 1935, Page 2
Word Count
148SOCIAL CREDIT. Hawera Star, Volume LIV, 23 April 1935, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hawera Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.