RULES OF CRICKET.
GIL.LIG AN’S SUGGESTIONS
ADVERSE CRITICISM
BY CABLE—PRESS ASSOCIATION—COPYRIGHT.
LONDON, April If). The Daily Herald, ‘ in- an editorial, states that it does not see why, owing to Gilligan’s bad luck with the toss, he should flirt with the idea of abolishing it, except for the first and -last test. ’The suggestion threatens an integral oart of the game, like most expedients for brightening cricket and evening the chances. Gilligan’s plan in open criticism of the present practices of cricket, is all right, so long as players play to win and accent the luck of the game philosophically.
EIGHT BALL OVER
AUSTROLf AN SUPPORT
REPLY TO GILLIG AN
Received April 21, 9.35 a.m. SYDNEY, April 21. A meeting of the New South. Wales Cricket Association has expressed itself strongly in favour of the retention of the eight ball over. Reference wa« made to Gilligf.n’s recent cabled opposition, and it was pointed out- that the English captain had no statistics on his side. He himself was not a fast bowler and Howell was seldom used. The advantage from the slow bowler’.s point .of view was beyond question.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19250421.2.23
Bibliographic details
Hawera Star, Volume XLV, 21 April 1925, Page 5
Word Count
187RULES OF CRICKET. Hawera Star, Volume XLV, 21 April 1925, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hawera Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.