LEG THEORY DISPUTE

Grey River Argus, 16 June 1933, Page 6

LEG THEORY DISPUTE

PRESS VIEWS’ IN LONDON. LONDON, .him' IL Ben Travers, writing in fhe “Star.’’ says; Maryleboiie’s cable exhibits all the dignified unimpeachable characteristics of Maryleboiie legislation at their worst. They are prepared Io bankrupt the Counties, in defence jf what nt. heart they must know to be unsporting, and a denial of what they must know to be true. The barracking protest was justified, but out of place. Thp •‘Morning I’ost ’ ’ says: We had hoped that Maryleboiie would strive to allay, rather than run the tjsk of again inflaming ill-te.mper. The sno stance of their protest may convince cool headed judgment, but the terms in which it is crouched are. little ca' ciliated to heal the breach. The “Mirror” says: Marylebone has given Australia the right answer. Plain talking was needed, and the stern barracking rebuke ought to do good.

DEEBY V. WEST INDIES.

LONDON, June M. West Indies, Jirst. 281 (Headley 58, Sealey 58, Mitchell 4 fur 98,1 Derl.v, first, 2 for 88.