THE ETERNAL DREYFUS CASE
[per press association]
Tby electric telegraph— copyright.]
(Received April 23, at 440 pm.) Paris, April 22. General Saussier told Colonel Forzinotti that the case against Dreyfus was a mere presumption. If treason was assured Dreyfus ought to be sent to Soudan and executed there. Forzinotti in his evidence indicated that Paty dv Clam constantly tried to entrap Dreyfus, aud wished to resort ioxaeans which he (ForzinoitJ) refused to sanction. Dreyfus's demeanour convinced most of the police officials of his innoceuce.
Commandant Lallet, a member of the I court-martial, declares that Henry, being the principle witness, his suicide necessitated a revision of the testimony respectiug a discovery of the compromising document in Dreyfus's waistcoat after his degradation. Thiscausedthe public to suspect that it wasplanted there by Henry's agent.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA18990424.2.15
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, Volume LVII, Issue 10266, 24 April 1899, Page 4
Word Count
131THE ETERNAL DREYFUS CASE Grey River Argus, Volume LVII, Issue 10266, 24 April 1899, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.