SAMOAN MANDATE
CASE FOR NEW ZEALAND
(Australian Press Association.) (By Cable—Press Assn—Copyright.)
GENEVA, June 22. . The Mandates Commission 'have not yet concluded their examination of Sir James Parr and General Richardson, concerning Samoa. They will be further examined to-morrow. The questions and their answers closely followed the lines of the Royal Commission’s report, but various members of the Commission put questions based on the petition that has been submitted by Mr Nelson and by certain of the natives. One question related to the complaint that Samoans had not been introduced into fihe Legislative Council, as was promised them. ' It was explained that this proposal originated in New Zealand in 1923, but that the Chiefs did not respond. General Richardson said he was convinced that the Samoan natives did not want representation in the Legislative Council. Moreover, he said, the Royal Commission had pointed out the dangers that were involved. Sir James Parr said that the native
agitation in Samoa grew to large proportions owing to unceasing and nnscruplous agitation of half-a-dozen whites, while the Administrator had neither legal power nor the police necessary to deal with agitators./
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19280623.2.35
Bibliographic details
Greymouth Evening Star, 23 June 1928, Page 7
Word Count
187SAMOAN MANDATE Greymouth Evening Star, 23 June 1928, Page 7
Using This Item
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Greymouth Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.