Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LABOUR AFFILIATIONS AND WATERSIDE DISPUTE

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —The statement in the Press asserting that various organisations, including the New Zealand Workers’ Union, support the action of the National Executive of the Federation of Labour with regard to the watersiders’ dispute, is certainly very misleading. The facts are that this course was taken without reference to rank and file members or the members of the Executive Council of the New Zealand Workers’ Union. It was assumed by the national president and general secretary that members of the Executive Council would concur in the action taken, but as far as the Otago and Southland branch of the New Zealand Workers’ Union is concerned, the matter has not been deliberated upon and consequently, we, as executive councillors representing this branch, have not concurred in the action takon. We are etc., —E. It. Brooks (Dunedin), C. Cleghorn (Coal Creek). J. Ward (Bluff), national councillors. January 8*

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19470108.2.109.5

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 25994, 8 January 1947, Page 8

Word Count
154

LABOUR AFFILIATIONS AND WATERSIDE DISPUTE Evening Star, Issue 25994, 8 January 1947, Page 8

LABOUR AFFILIATIONS AND WATERSIDE DISPUTE Evening Star, Issue 25994, 8 January 1947, Page 8