Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BAKERS’ DISPUTE.

TO TUB EDITOR.

Sir, —ln justice to Messrs Searle and Eberhardt I cannot allow Joseph Ayers’s letter to go before the public without contradiction. I was in their employ as foreman for eighteen months, and left of my own accord about two months ago, so I am not interested in the firm now. I usually engaged the casual hands,, who, I always understood, were paid at the rate of Ids per day if engaged by the day ; if by the week, then there was an agreement for so much per week between the firm and the man. ' I can say, sir, without fear of contradiction that I always got what I bargained for from the firm, and I don’t remember an instance of their ever going back on their word to anyone. Though I am not in the trade now, my sympathies are still with it, and I was sorry to see that my old mates had placed Joseph Ayers in the box to give ev'denoe before the Board knowing him so well.—l am, etc., Jno. Robertson. Dunedin, August 21. [This correspondence can only be continned in our advertising columns. —-Eb. E.S.]

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18970821.2.31.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 10399, 21 August 1897, Page 2

Word Count
195

THE BAKERS’ DISPUTE. Evening Star, Issue 10399, 21 August 1897, Page 2

THE BAKERS’ DISPUTE. Evening Star, Issue 10399, 21 August 1897, Page 2