Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CAVERSHAM ELECTION.

TO TIIK EDITOR. Bm,—You colour 9 of lost evening contain a letter from '< No Surrender,” which seems to me a curious combination of direct misstatements, unsupported assertions, and misrepresented facts. It is such a wonderful mixture as to read more like in ment than a criticism of a political speech. If Ur Rutherford had said (which be did not) that bis audience were not intelligent enough to understand him, though be would have been wrong in applying such a remark to the general body, yet the cap would (by his own showing) have tightly fitted "No Surrender.” To all who heard Ur Rutherford at Green Island, "No Surrender’s ” literary fumble is a sufficiently severe comment on his intelligence.—l am, eto, Discbir Bfkbb*dib. Caversham, August 24.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18870824.2.24.3

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 7298, 24 August 1887, Page 2

Word Count
127

CAVERSHAM ELECTION. Evening Star, Issue 7298, 24 August 1887, Page 2

CAVERSHAM ELECTION. Evening Star, Issue 7298, 24 August 1887, Page 2