CONNOR v. MACKAY.
TO THE EDITOB. Sib,—ln your issue of last evening you state that a private telegram had been received stating that the appeal in this case had been allowed. I therefore send you copy of a telegram sent by me to Mr Stout, a counsel in the cause, and a copy of his reply. From these you will see that if such a telegram has been re-, oeived the information contained in it is incorrect.—l am, etc., D. D. Macdonalb. Dunedin, May 27. Dunedin, 27th May, 1882. Robert Stout, Occidental Hotel, Wellington. Connor v. Mackay.—Evksino Star states that a private telegram has been received stating that the appeal had been allowed. I wish to contradict authoritatively if incorrect. D. D. Macdonau). Wellington, May 27. D. D. Macdonald, Esq., solicitor, Dunedin. Only rule nisi granted. Argument fixed for Tuesday. Robbrt Stout.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18820527.2.24.1
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 5993, 27 May 1882, Page 3
Word Count
142CONNOR v. MACKAY. Evening Star, Issue 5993, 27 May 1882, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.