Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNLICENSED BREWER

CASE IN COURT

'. A charge that not being tho u.qltler of a brewer's licence he curried on the trado oi- business of a brewer, was made against William Hollway, $~'ro-, lief worker,, in the Petone Cou'it t;o----day. Hq was convicted and fined £25 by Mr. W. F. Stilwell, S.M., being al-' lowed four months in w hich to pay th© fine. ' ,' ' Mr. R. E. Pope entered a plea bf not. guilty on behalf of Hollway. ■ ' . On bohalf of the Customs Department, Mr. A. Paul said that tho charge was laid under the Finance Act. On Do* comber 15 Constable Gill was irifioduced to Hollway at Eastbourne. ,He entered his premisos, and after b,eing given a drink of beer was sold" twb bottles of home-brewed beer for. Id 6d. "Evidence was givon by Constables Dwycr and Gordon pfi-having searched Hollway's premises under a warranty Tiicy found 29 largo and 9 small/bottlcs, of home-brewed beer, two petrol tins containing stout in tho process of manufacture, a linen bag containing freshlyused hops, and a keg containing the remains of brewing materials. Air Popo pointed,out the stringent pi ovisions of the Finance Act, saying it was a revenue Act. In this case a constable was sold two bottles of beer. The .question arose whether Hollway was carrying on the business of a brewer. He submitted with respect that it was flattering to call him. a brewer. _ "That depends on the reception no gets from his customers," commented Mr. Stilwell. " • Mr Pope snid the evidence wa» quite consistent with the innocent making of "homo brew," which was very popular Tho implements found therd-did not prove that more beer was brewed than was required for private conMagistrate gave notice of his intention to convict Mr. Paul «£ his Dopaitjnent viewed the illicit sale of liquor in a very serious light..Tho offence was very hard to d?tcct. "Apparently tho rcceni convictions in-this district go unheeded,'? he commented. "A chaigo "by tho police against Holiday under the Licensing, Act was "ilubciV'Coombes, a relief worker, also appealed in the Potono Court charged with carrying on the trade or business of a brewer without a licence. He was convicted and fined £25, being allowc-d four months in which to pay the fine. ■ , , Constable Gill -gave evidcncp .Of buying beer from tho defendant. Inc Doiico evidenco stated that 40 small bottles of stout-and 50 quart bottles of boor were found on the dciendant s premises. , - , Mr. R. E. Popo represented the aefemlant.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19350130.2.118

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Issue 25, 30 January 1935, Page 13

Word Count
412

UNLICENSED BREWER Evening Post, Issue 25, 30 January 1935, Page 13

UNLICENSED BREWER Evening Post, Issue 25, 30 January 1935, Page 13