Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"UNDESIRABLE"

SUNDAY CONCERTS

AUCKLAND CENSOR'S CLAIM

"Genuine items approved were often substituted by parodies, some,of these being of a filthy and disgusting nature. Many of the concerts held were, I consider, quite undesirable and unsuitable, and such should bo eliminated," stated Mr. J. B. Paterson, censor for the City Council, iii the course of a grave indictment 'of Sunday concerts which he had attended after approving the programmes (states the "Auckland Star"). In his report to the council last week, ho gave his opinion that in many instances the concerts'were entirely unsuitable for the day concerned. When programmes had been submitted ' for approval in order that permits could be issued, he had taken every reasonable precaution to ensure that only items considered appropriate and suitable should be approved. Mr. Paterson said he had found on visiting the places of entertainment that the original programmes were in many cases departed from.

"The proceeds of most of the conceits wove ostensibly for charitable purposes, or other deserving eases," said ■ Mr. Patcr.soii, "but artists said to be giving their services for nothing have been found subsequently to be receiving money for their services. I have had admissions and prot)f o£ this, which is, I believe, contrary to the law, and iii any ease contrary to .the conditions under which approval is given for the programmes.

"When programme permits wero applied for', with proceeds to be in aid of institutions, I found upon inquiry from two institutions concerned that the applicant had not their authority. Bequests for items wero at times clouded, and many evasions occurred. Encores were allowed, subject to their being in keeping with the approved item."

From financial statements furnished, continued the censor, most of the returns showed a loss, no benefit whatever being given to the desired object. Ho reminded the council that, on a permit being granted, they sent an officer, who had to be paid by tho council. The money was not recovered from the entertainment organisers.

"During the past month," ho concluded, "I have refused permits to a number of applicants who had had ■warnings and who again committed further breaches. The ' question .of . the legality of practically compelling people to : pay for admission by silver coin might well be considered.".

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19340716.2.102

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXVIII, Issue 13, 16 July 1934, Page 10

Word Count
374

"UNDESIRABLE" Evening Post, Volume CXVIII, Issue 13, 16 July 1934, Page 10

"UNDESIRABLE" Evening Post, Volume CXVIII, Issue 13, 16 July 1934, Page 10