AN AUCKLAND OPINION
Id a preliminary review of prospects-for tho Grand National Steeplechase and Grand National Hurdles, the Auckland writer "Archer" leans toward Lucessj Billy Boy, Town ■_ Beauty, ■< and Paris ' s for ■■ the Steeplechase, and to Pahu, r.Paddon, Membo, and Full Mark for the Hurdles.
- Of Lucess he writes: "Lucess, who was third last year, is not.badly treated with 10.4. It is. against him in long races that he is not a genuine stayer, but he lias the advantage^ -ot being a polished fencer,' and in-' the class of field he will' meet thisyear he should hare reasonably good prospects." .
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19320730.2.141.7
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 26, 30 July 1932, Page 21
Word Count
100AN AUCKLAND OPINION Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 26, 30 July 1932, Page 21
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.