CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 133, 3 December 1930, Page 19

CIVIL CASES

Judgment .ioFjJiauitiff by. default was given by; Mr.; j. .S.^Barton, S.M., in the Masistrate^V.C'puj't^lo-clay in the following.midefehdodjeivil cases: — H. W. -Tolau'. v'.-;Edwin ..Dennis, £10> A: S. Pat'ersou ■> and Co., Ltd., v. L. J. ! Connolly, £19't39;-lld; Zapou Lacciuer Co. (Nil.);' Ltd.," y.'P. E. Stanlake, £27 Us; j >j Z. -Express: Co., Ltd., v. J. F. Woods, dSIO 17s 2d; Waterworths, Ltd.,. v. Oscar. ■V '-• .Jorgensen,- £27 7s Id; Parkinson &.Z.), Ltd. (in liquidation) v. T. h. Jones and Co., £fiO; L. J. Purdie and Co., Ltd., v. W. H. Brown, ss; Commissioner, of Taxes v. Henry John Falleni, £12 11s; Commissioner of Taxes v. William David Wilson, £3 10s lid; Oifford Nicholls,v. L. Withers, £2- Ss; W. J. Seater and Co. y. Thonlas-Balfoiir-Masoii, £2G 10s lOd; Dominion Portrait Co. v. L. A. M. Matthews (separate estate), £4 2s; C B. M'Dougull v. M. S. Harvey (separata estate), £1 19s 6d; E. Dickson v. F. T. Quinlivan, £10 15s 6d; Superior Pictures, LtcU v. D. A. Hoskin, £10 7s 6d; AmaV -am'ated Brick and Pipe Co. (Wellington); Ltd., v.'H. B. M'lntyre, Us Bdj James Ernest Gear v. Frank labian Wills, -£49 10s; John Duthie and Co., Ltd v H. :J. Reeves, £29 6s 3d; Hickmott and-Sons■ v. P. Richardson, £6 17s 6d-.Nestle ancl Anglo-Swiss Condlensecl Milk Co. (Australasia), Ltd., v. C. Hogan, £13 15s (id; -pestle and Anglo-Swiss Condensed ftfilk Co. (Australasia), Ltd., v. 0., La Hogue.' £2 14s 9d; Nestle and Aiyrlo-Swiss Condensed Milk Co. (Australasia), Ltd.. v. P. R. Kent, £50 13s 7d; Bristol Piano' Co., Ltd., v. Kate Msie Hyde-'.(separate, estate), 17s; Karlfovd and Co., Ltd., v.-A . Bird, £2 Is; RadEorcl and Co, Ltd.,,,v.,A. Garner, £7; The Crown v. Apolina? Mischewski (separate es-fatel,-'£3:-7sTR- A. Large and Co. v. Keid and. Waters,., £24 Us 6d; Vicke^y and Inkevsell, Ltd., v. J. H. Curtis, £5; Billiards,' Ltd;,, v., Buckley Bros £26 Us; Dominion Motors, Ltd., v. -J. D. Mitchell, £1 As Od; Dalgety and Co. y. J. i. . iaylor/ £11 2s'6d; Shell Co. of N.Z., Ltd.,j, IS. 6. Peters,- £33 Is 4d; A. Levy, Ltd., v C. L. Collins, £12 12s 8d; H. Baldwin and Co.; Ltd.. v. J, H. G, Henderson, £10 Ws 6d; W,,P. Sommemlle v. 1. Eales,\£lo 10s:" C. S. Parsons v. J. Andrews, £2 2s Sd; Mrs. H. Morris v. li. H. Morris, £3ii 10s 3d; Nestle and AngloSwiss Conderjsed Milk Co. (Australasia), Ltd v W." 'Marr, £5 10f: Nestle and Attgl'o-Swis's Condensed Milk Co. (Austra : •lasia)^Ltd., v. M. Yore (separate estate), £5 16s 3d; Nestle and Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Co. (Australasia), Ltd, v. J. H. Gunning, £39 3s lOd; Hugh Hunter Electrical Service, Ltd., v. Phyllis Cummins (separate estate), 13s 6d; Co-op, Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. H. Chandler, £0 16s 9d; G. Ardreyand Son, Ltd., v. J. G. Churchill, 17s 6d; Texas Co. (Australasia), Ltd.,'v. L. Connolly, £4jßs; "James Smith, Ltd., ,v. F. Qumhvan, £31 IBs 8d; Amalgamated Wireless (Australasia), Ltd.,■ v.--. Radio Specialties, Ltd., £7; Billiards, Ltd., V. R. L. Ashley, £16 7s 'd- Mary Ellen Macarthy-Reid v. Victor A. Smith, £65 5s Sd; T. P. Hoare v. W E. Castle, £13 13s 6d; K. ?-™f v C Taylor (separate estate), 17s fed; Mlwin RiebV v. Mac Donald and Brattle, £111 15s;- Dr. W. F. Shirer v. M. Mitchmson, junr., £7 10s. ' •'"'._ ■