SUPREME COURT

Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 102, 26 October 1929, Page 18

SUPREME COURT

QUARTERLY? SESSIONS

-DIVORCE?-ND'CTVIL GASES

The following divorce aud civil cases v hav.":-bean -set-down*'for- hearing-at- the ci quarterly sessibni of the Wellington Supreme Court, commencing on Tuesday next:— DIVORCE CASES? '„ * ■'•-,.• '' i .■''"' ■'■ i Before a Judge and jury of twelve:— e Angelina Florence Harvey v. Harold Dion Har.vey (alleged adultery); Ralph Leeming c v.. Marie Leeming (alleged, adultery)"; Wil- 3 liarA Hartley v. Jamsettie Hartley (alleged h adultery); John Charles M'Girinity v. Ivy May M'Ginnity (alleged adultery) ;-.Gui- i seppe Mirabito v. Mary; Elizabeth Miratito (alleged adultery); -Yank Cecil J.hriCc_k 1: v.:Lena Cook (alleged adultery); William 1: Alfred Whittall v. Gertrude Alice Whittill (alleged adultery. ..->,- - cases befor-a'Jiidge-aloneirt- c Daniel Joseph Kbstcr y. • Hilare Eostei T (ajteged desertion),*. James ScotsOn v.--Eva l Caroline Scotson (alleged desertion); r Joseph Percival Bevell v. Rose Elizabeth Golsey Revell (alleged separation); John Graham Gow v. Alice Marianne Gow: (al- <. leged separation); Chariest: Wilfred Dun- •■ can; v. Eileen Margaret Duncan (alleged , separation); Charlotte Elizabeth Houston j v.: David Houston (alleged desertion); * Robert Johnston v. Jane Anne "Johnston . (alliged desertion). *.' .•- ' ■"'.Undefended divorce cases:-^Harold Alfred- William Gray v. Lillian Grace Gray* (alleged desertion); George AVilliam YaL-i ; lop :.v. Kate Edith Yallop: (alleged .'deser-: ■;, ~Kbn)t 'I*sKeHCharles Thackwell.yV Violet ; TJiacfrifell: (alleged, adultery); .BayidvPorK ' teous v. Mary Eileen Porteous: (alleged: adultery); Albert John Harris v.;-:Maria. , Therese Harris (alleged separation); James. Major Ottaway v. Mary Ottavvay/('alleged desertion): Henry Collin's, v'v.^Florence; ' Truscott Collins- (aileged';-:_dulter.y)*.vKeith' Howard Chappiai^^.^yf>ileen-:iyiin_i-'jottli-erine"(^pin^''?al^e'dv^duTter^)'^'"Andre'iv , Mackenzie^.,* Ru-yAOigav Mackenzie ■(_.■' ; leged separation)'; .Edwin-. J*imes'.Kni^ht;v,:: ' Edna Julia Knlgli£: (alleged ;desertion)'-J; Hilda J v tdithsGrßce .Woolc6tt v. - -CharlesReadm?m ..^oolcott^-: (alleged adultery); 'James'Hont-gue Campbell-. \\ Annie Dodds Campbell .';;(aliege'd'v hdultery).; ''■ Iris H Maim Fraser vV^^Dmiald ; Brtice: FraseiV ..(alleged adultery)::":.;AiiceVEdith, Aveiy '.yl Lindsay IVai^irfgAvery.' '(alleged adultery j: - :Louisa " IJunh'vfc .Jo.sephv_j|anii -ideseHiori ..'or -.:'sepir_ti6ri).i.-;:;Daisy : : . Layinia;-;;l_lnan ■;Saneoc^vT/'Ernest'AKred Haiicdck.-Xalteg.^ •"> ed';«p__atibi^')"';''-:iS'-tall ■: James^vioD-yid «7fcTft^';-(Siwd:".4^r^D)i-:?ei?}V'^fe.rshall--.«€hsivdler-j£,*^£6mo'-d : George Ch'aridter--(alj fl^ed^rieseiSonX^'Leb -Reginald \ Jury ,'y;'" F.i'K'el.^Jury;- (alleged adultery)';-,-FitzgeraM Cla'i'ic,.A*.'.-"Violet.. Harriet.,Clark, _eeertion)j, George.Thomas. Pearce" y.vPlorence Ada 'Pearce (restitution .-of "conjugal rights); Doris^Edria, Tonge ■:' v;; William Tonge (allegedft>senaratidn);- „' Th6mas Joseph ConwayH";- Elsi_':iConway-, "(alleged desertion); Grace Winifred Raddon v. Kenneth Hiuth Hunter Raddon (alleged adultery); John Howard v. Jean Duncan Howard (alleged adultery); Marie Maedonald v. William Murdoch Maedonald (restitution of conjugal rights): Cyril Hitchcock v. Catherin..Hitchcock (alleged iiipanity); Hilda Carmen Griggs v. Raymond Frances Woodley Griggs (alleged separation); Leo Anders Jacobsen v. Gwladys 3_lmß-Jacobeen (alleged adultery); -John Eichard. Grindrod v. Mary Louisa Grindrod (alleged desertion)* Leslie Hisen Sternberg v. Theresa -Phillina Sternberg (restitution, of conjugal riehts);'.' Percival Francis:'. Mulhane v. Ada Isobel Mulhaufi l(ulleeed desertion); Walter John Sealnmelll

v. Winifred Scammell (alleged separation); £ Jean Charlotte Lavinia Alexander v. Al- ce fred Montague Alexander (alleged separation); Gwendolin Sunday Grace Dillon v. £ Clarence Henry Dillon (alleged adultery); Mildred Florence' Baker-v. Alfred Baker sj: (alleged separation); Hannah Ferguson v. Ronald Thomas Ferguson (alleged separa- F: tion); George Hamilton Wilkin v. Hilda le Thomas Wilkin (alleged desertion); John Lorimer Craib Allan v. Doris Allan (al- d; leged desertion); Frederick William Hill v. Dorothy Norwood Hill (restitution of ai conjugal rights). "}- ---: CIVIL CASES; (Before a Judge and Common Jury.) C Frederick George Everson v.' Canadian a Knight and 'Whippet, Motor Company, £1013 damages for injuries allegedly re- ' ceived. - Robert Bowes Kirkland v. John Dela court Merrett and Henry Stanley f M'Lucas, £1164 damages for injuries al- _ legedly received. . ' - John Alton v. Frederick: Charles Facer, - £2323 damages for alleged negligence.. .- • * Arthur William Ives and another v. William Peters, :£Bl2 damages for alleged negligence. .' *■ .., Gertrude Mary le Sueur .y. Leo Chung,----£451 damages for injuries allegedly re- . , ceived. : :,' ■'.' '„ „ Andrew Parlane and another v.. Abele . Dalla Riva, £501 damages for alleged •£ negligence. . ; ;_ (Before a. Judge alone.) i: 1 Lillian Mtii-gueritc Henderson v. Cyril ' Sidney Brice, decree, etc. t -Moore, Wilsdn and Co., Ltd:, v. Oswald ;M. Smith and Co., Ltd., £431 damages : : for alleged breach of contract. , Frederick 'Henry Rennie -v. Margaret., Diamond, £745 allegedly due under agree- . ment. !•: -v ' Enid Taylor/- Burnley and others v. ' j George Richards, £3225 allegedly due un- r ',- der'mortgage.;?.' -, '- George Hamilton Scott v. William Stew- , •• art,: declaration, etc. v William/BlSir v. Robert Malcolm, Ltd., * t. £2633 damages for alleged wrongful dis- j y missal. b Self-Help Co-op. Grocery, Ltd., v. James ' I Ai Hannah and'others, £2000 damages for j ? alleged breach of contract. r 'Milburn Lime and Cement Co., Ltd., ] ■- v.. Onion Steam Ship Company, Ltd. £652 I damages for alleged breach of contract, ' --'■ * • Fletcher Construction Company, Ltd., v. • ■'; Thom.as Rowell, £2084 allegedly due under ' »! eeritract. s- ■' .Henrv. Joseph Dalton M'Manaway v. ; Wpdlf'Black and others, declaration, etc. s Australian Provincial Assurance Associae tio.n.-litd^iv. National Mutual Association, •• 4 Ltd.,'.ofV.Australasia, £10,000 damages for y allegedMiider. ' • a Ali'ce-iMariaiine Gow v. John Graham n Gow,- :|iooo,'-'mbney allegedly advanced, n ' Thomis-ißoweW v- Maurice Goldsbrough, it. 'declarationVvSv .'.-; ' ' d R..O£iSca-kiir v. F. M. Clarke, £200 II damages^'fb'i*'.injuries allegedly received. !*■ -A.'EI-Gooper v. Te Aro Loan and. Dis' K count Co., Ltd., £605, money allegedly d lent - -.... ... ......... , - . d William Richard Garbett v. Arthur (*• Charles Davis, declaration, etc. il William Collinghourne Hewitt v. Official n Assignee of property of Edward John is Barnes "and another, £500 allegedly due un:d der assignment. .... '': ■/ l- Arthur Cothetti'v; Bernard Jackson Liez 1- and another,;'£4Bl, damages for injuries n allegedly,- received.:.:" n- Arthur Young and another v. F. Renouf, ,i- £580 for goods allegedly sold. it- Lillian Mary Butler v. Florence Louisa ii-. Mangin, rescission.of .contract... . . id " Frank Nossiter v. Alfred Kilsby and ana- other, specific performance. i's Frank Gascoigne Milne v. Public Trusm tee as executor of Sarah Elleu Lally Nayd- lor, declaration. m Archibald Maclcinlay v. Public Trustee rp as executor, of S -lah Ellen Lally. Naylor, al declaration._.*.'.. -:'.'. ■^■..■■.~ .. - ir. Louis Shardlow by his guardian ad litem, :11 Henry George ::Charfllovv : -v;.:Mary. Wilton,

£552 damages for injuries allegedly received. James M'Goldrick v. Kate M'Goldrick, £300 allegedly due under mortgage. Joseph Paterson Shand v. James Hall, specific performance. Gannow Engineering Company, Ltd., v. Frederick Richardson, £605, money allegedlv owing. ■ ' Charles Howden v. William Peters, £200 damages for'alleged negligence. Sarah Jane Parratt v. Guardian Trust and Executors' Co. of New Zealand, Ltd., as executor of Oliver Witton Clayton, £500 for. services allegedly rendered. John Sheriff v. Wellington Patent Slip Company, Ltd., £1000 damages for injuries allegedly received. Lily. Olive Sumner v. L. C. Purton and another, declaration, etc. Jessie Hansen v. James Maygar Ottoway, £250 damages for alleged -reach" of promise. ■■■''. . Catherine Ann Evans v. Wellington Hospital Board, injunction. Konrad Pedel'sen v. Gannavvay and Co., Ltd., -£673 damages for injuries allegedly received.