CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CV, Issue 126, 30 May 1928, Page 4

CIVIL CASES

. .Judgment for plaintiff by default was giver by .Mr. W. G. lUddcll, S.JI., in the" following undefended civil eases in the Jiagistrate'a Court yesterday :— A. S. Paterson and Co,, Ltd., v.Nyobe'rg and Armstrong, £4!) 10s 3d;. A. ■S. Paterson and Co., Ltd., v. Armstrong and Son,1 £50 19s 10d; The Bristol l'iano Company, Ltd., v. Raymond Ernest Osmond, £2 IBs 3d; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Wellington Creameries. Cheese, and Butter Union v. C. B. Sage; £1 ss; Hull County Council v. Jane Mary Staples (sep. astate), £2 5s 9d;S. Jackson v. Mart Poole, costs only, 13s; A.B.C. Motors (N.Z.), Ltd., v. J. M. Pearson and Co., £29 15s; A.B.C. Motors (N.Z.), Ltd., v. E. George, £3 IDs 3d; A.B.C. Motors (N.Z.), Ltd., v. Eric O'Sullivan, £17; National Rubber Supplies,' Ltd., v. 3. Blake, £1 2s 2d; State Advances Superintendent v. Harry • Kerigan, £36 7ff M; S. Free v. H. C. W. Duffell, £2 2s; L. J. Purdle and Co., -Ltd., v. Central Electric Company, costs only, £1 3s; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., aad Mouat Bros., v. L. Ball, £6 11s Gd; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and E. anrf E. Tinjey and Co., Ltd., v. W. Bruce, £31 19s 9d; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and James Price v. H. Denham, £11; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and A. H. Young v. A. Cox (sep. estate), £6 2s 7d;-Do-minion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and E. and E. Tingey and Co., Ltd., v. Vi Jacobs,' £14 6s sd; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and J. M Cabe v. fl. Macey, 15s; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and T. Walsh v. Harry Carter, £6; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Waterworks, Ltd., v, F. B. Butler, £16 16s sd; Dominion . Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and L. W. Cross v. R. Nell, £4 10s; Dominion Mercantilo Agency, Ltd., and: Crawley, Ridley, and Co., Ltd., v. E. O'SulUvan, £14 17s 6d; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Recce and Archer y. K. Reed, £1 18s; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Crawley, Ridley, and Co., Ltd., v. G. Rock, £4 10s; Dominion' Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and Quic-Kleen Company (N.Z.), v. W. H. Semmens, £11 2s; Dominion, Mercantile Agency, Ltd., and E. Cholerton v. Si. J. Sheary (aep. estate), £2 10s; Vacuum Oil Company Pty., Ltd., v. T. A. Farrell, £63 4s 8d; J. H. Whittaker and Sons V. G. Fitzjohn, £12 5s 3d; J. H.,Whittaker and Sons V. Mrs. Williams (sep. estate), £4 10s 6d; Fanny Whately v. Jamos Smith, £3; William Forsyth. v. David Buchanan, £2 17s 6d; Gordon arid Gotch (Aust.), Ltd., v. C. Cnpestoke, £1 15s; Gordon and Gotch (Aust.), Ltd., v. G. Cottrell, £4 ss; Gordon and Gotch (Aust.), Ltd., v. J. Hayes (sep. estate), £3 19s; Gordon and Gotch (Aust.), Ltd., v C. A. Thomas, £5; F. M. Coulton v. F. W. S. D,urney, £57 9s; Vacuum Oil Company Pty., Ltd., v. Wallace Motors, £32 15s 4d; The Lawrence and Hanson Electrical Company, Ltd., v. Radio Service Station, £14 15s 'Sd; The Lawrence and Hanson Electrical Company, Ltd., v. J. Cottingham, £2 8s; St. Crispin Shoo Company v. D. C. Little, £15 4s 5(1; John Ash v. Percy Nicholl, £2 10s; The Sterling Electric- Plating Company v. A. Jenkins, £2; A. S. Paterson and Co., Ltd., v. B. C. Anderson, £29 12s; The British Imperial Oil Company Pty., Ltd., v. .Wallace Motors, ,£l2 123 lid;,W..Wakefield v.-:E. Mason; £75; .W. M.,Veitch t..J. Wright, £2 ISs 6d; The M'Mahon Motor Supplies, Ltd., v.' IT.'W. Macßeady, £1 10s; Picot Bros. v. G. Duncan,:£lo 12s; Premier Motors v. Robert Henry Gregson, £11 5s 9d; E. A; Pollett v. Athol Legg, £3 18s 9d; George Gapes v. Vincent Shepherd, £1 4s; E. W. Hursthpuse and Co., v. W.N. R. Snow, £7; A. and T. Burt, Ltd., v. E. Miinro, £101 8s 9d; Stanley George Stephensbn !v. Albert Ernest Kearnes, £4 14s Gd. ■ , , The largest collection. ■ firm in New Zealand is the Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., of Wellington, . Auckland, and Christchurch, with agents.in; every New Zealand town, and associate .offices throughout the world.—Advt. .;''