Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WINNERS UNIMPRESSIVE

■FAULTY HANDLING 'BY BACKS."

(Received 23rd October, 2.45 p.m.) LONDON, 22nd October. The game was not an edifying exposition of Rugby football. ■ Lancashire's tackling was deplorably weak, the backs relying principally on line kicking.-. The All.Blacks got most out of the scrums, .tut many of their passing attacks failed through Paewai's and M'Gre^or*s faulty handling. Lancashire improved in the second half, especially the forwards; who made some fine rallying rushes, but the All Blacks' defence Iwas sound, Nepia pending off with , fine lengthy ' kicks. Many of the All Blacks' attacks were disorganised and lacked finish. The All Blacks were much below standard, and their place-kicking was weak. Svenson and 'Hart played well, while Masters,' Richardsos, and Stewart were the best of the forwards. ■ ■ • •

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19241023.2.76.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 99, 23 October 1924, Page 6

Word Count
125

WINNERS UNIMPRESSIVE Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 99, 23 October 1924, Page 6

WINNERS UNIMPRESSIVE Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 99, 23 October 1924, Page 6