Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRAFFIC IN CEMETERY

' PROVISION FOR GREATER SAFETY.

•: .Whether or not'the plans .-drawn up : for, the; construction - of a:. linking-up length of road to .provide ;for.one-way traffic through-the Xarori; cemetery will come to. anything this^ year depends on ■whether -or' not; the Finance Committee .of the City. Council; can,,, figuratively speaking, waVe a.wand;and call "up the necessary mbney 'forithV.work;. no provision haying been made' for-■■it'in this J year's; estimates.' If keeping: at :it will ! sop the'road sent -.through,.■however,-' it j will Be constructed,, for the Ceae'i# ies Committee 'of: the council is ce?Uinly'! sticking to its plan.' ! /At the last meet- : ing-of the 'council ,the. plan;: was .adversely reported upon by one committee, but straightway the Cemeteries Committee rose and . protested ; and .'.'' had " - the -question ■■ referred .on ' to',: the ■ ■ Finance Coriimittee to find tlie money, it any ;money_ is to/be found." Whether or not the Finance Committee has-been successful will, prosumab'ly, be reported to the.council at its next'meeting. ' • . ■-.In .the meantime the.Cemeteries":Com;,mittee',has 'been making certain .other -minor, provisions; for.,,the. greater, safety of those who visit theLcemetery. A:foot-' ■.path has''been constructed; along 'the' main driye for. a considerable: dfctance. but unfortunately it 'has not' been possible to carry this,.; footway the full length of the,.', drive. on'■ one ■ side of tlfu roadway; ..pedestrians may walk so far on a; footpath on the left of the carriage way, but must, then cross.the-: traffic lines; to reach .; the continuation of the footway on ..the right of the. carriage"1 way, an-arrangement..Which is unavoidable by 'reason; of ,the:, position' of'a-largo burial vault, and an arrangement which, is not as satisfactory :as it might be. . -Tho. bylaw speed limit '■■. through the cemetery is four miles v : nn 'hour, .with, which bylaw, the committee "and v probably most'motorists do'not agree. : If was accordingly proposed by the committee "that the. minimum speed should bo increased to.eight miles per hour.-.as a, ■ perfectly safe and more reasonable speed. 'With this proposal the.-council as a whole did not agree. ,-. The committee, while believing Jfour'miles :-an hour too low a speed—probably' not one driver out of ~-fifty." attempts to observe the-, bylaw' when Waving 'the cemetery— nevertheless looks: upon tho. speeds' as actually, set by;,soma drivers as alto gethor lop free and easy, and is therefore proposing that': Corporation-, traffic inspectors should at times visit the cemetery to see that drivers' ''handle their cajs with due consideration of others..

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19240827.2.75

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 50, 27 August 1924, Page 6

Word Count
396

TRAFFIC IN CEMETERY Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 50, 27 August 1924, Page 6

TRAFFIC IN CEMETERY Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 50, 27 August 1924, Page 6