Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OLD BOYS v. THORNDON.

Old Boys met Thorndon on Kelburn Park, and, batting first, made a good start, but finished only moderatelyRonaldson and Duncan, after Lambert had gone out lbw, put on over a hundred runs between them, when : Duncan was caught at the.wicket for 56, the score 131 for. two wickets. Barclay followed, and the total went to 172 when he was caught by Warne. Ronaldson was bowled by Tan-ant for 51, »nd Tucker, Bull, and Binnie all had short careers, with single figure scores. Trott and Ward made a better stand, and the total for/the innings reached 240. The bowling was evenly divided. Thorndon made a poor show against the bowling of Barclay and Tucker, and had lost six wickets for 60 when stumps were drawn. Following are the details':— OLD BOYS.—First Inning. H. Lambert, lbw, b King H A. Ronaldson, b Tarrant 51 Duncan, c M'Kellar, b Christopherson 56 W. Barclay, c Ward, b Tarrant 24 K. Tucker, lbw, b Christopherson ... 7 Bull, run out 9 Binnie, b Tarrant 8 Trott, lbw, b Phillips • ■ 28 Ward, b King 15 Wilson, not out .".. 0 M'Coll, b Phillips " : ° ' Extras "1 Total :..,... 240 Bowling Analysis.—Tarrant took- three wickets for 64 runs; King, two for 52;. Warne, none for 28; Phillips, tWo for 7; Leggatt, none for 23; Christopherson, two for 35. . , THORNDON.—First Innings, M'Kellar, b Barclay 12 Tilyard, lbw, b Barclay ' 1 Christopherson, c Wilson, b Barclay 14 Doneghue, c M'Coll, b Tucker ......... 10 Brook, b Barclay ...: 12 Tarrant, b Tucker "0 Phillips, not out 5 Leggatt,, not out •• 1 Extras' 5 Total for six wickets 60

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19220320.2.21.3

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 65, 20 March 1922, Page 4

Word Count
267

OLD BOYS v. THORNDON. Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 65, 20 March 1922, Page 4

OLD BOYS v. THORNDON. Evening Post, Volume CIII, Issue 65, 20 March 1922, Page 4