CIVIL BUSINESS.

Evening Post, Volume LXXXII, Issue 63, 12 September 1911, Page 8

CIVIL BUSINESS.

Before Dr. M'Arbhuri S.M., judgmenb was entered for plaintiff by default* in the following cases to-day :-~C. and A. Odltn Timber and Hardware Co., Ltd., v. Bernard Diederich, £i 16s, and costs, 15s; OnsloW Borough Council v. M. J. Richardson, 3s 2d and 6s; 1 New Zealand Electrical Fittings and Accessories Co. v. B. Diederich, £2 18s 9s and 16s; same v. Murphy Bros., £8 10s lid and £1 3s 6d ; H. Oscar Hewett and Co., Ltd., v. Frederick M'Kinley, £3 and 10s ; Odltn Co. v. William Dicl^ £3 15s lOd and 10s; Charles Jones v. Mrs. Elizabeth Neno, £1 5s lid and 3s; Harris and Bastin, Ltd., v. Jas. C. Montifiore, £5 Is 8d and £1 3s 6d; N.Z. Farmers' Co-operative Distributing Co. v. Charles Newport, £i 8s 8d and 10s; Wellington Traders' Agency (assignees All flack's Manufacturing Co.f v. Annie Shaw, 4s and ss; R. Hannah and Co., Ltd., v. , Ebenezer Day Hubault Buchanan, £1 9s 6d, and us; Mafia Thornton v. William Smibh, £2 10s, and 10s; Robert Hafclewood v. John Simpson, £l and 5?; National Hat Mills, Ltd., v. W. Nelson, £6 12s, and 8s; Emma Matilda Rushton v. Richard M. Walker, £2 16s, and 10s; Wy-lio Bros, v. William Roberts, £2 12s, and ss; Laws and Manning v. T. Hill, £2 19s od, and 10s ; E. H. Creaee ' and Son, Ltd., v. John Pauling, £3 7s 7d, and 10s; Cadbury Bros., Ltd., v. P. Walker £i 16s 6d, and os : Stephen Harris and Charles Russell. £5, and £1 Os Gd; and W. H. Bartlett v. Sbanley Parringbon, £3, and 10s.