SUPREME COURT.
» CIVIL SITTINGS. The Civil sittings of the Supreme Court will commence on Monday next The following cases will be heard before a Judge alone: — • William Sinclair v. Hugh Fraser aiKi James Alexander Fraser, claim, for £432 7b under an agreement. • Henry Hastings Cramp v. Charles Edwin Waters, claim for £200 for goods sold, etc. Frederick Spencer Easton and Barbara Ellen Austin y. John Raiubow Stanseli, claim for rectification of agreement. Emily Prosser v. the Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corporation, Ltd., claim for £170 on an insurance policy. Garnet Ryland Milne v. Charles John Olivecrona, accounts, etc. James Alexander Hannah v. Chari«« Nodine, claim for specific performance. Alfred James Skinner v. Jame« M'Guinncss, claim for £263 8s 3d, under* a contract. Karl Rasmuspen v. Edith Dorothy Ellis and John Eli Ellis, claim for injiino* tion, etc. The Wellington Steam Ferry Company, Ltd., v. the Commissioner of Taxee, claim for £341 10s, overpaid tax. ■ Timothy O'Neill and others v. the Commercial Union Assurance Company, Ltd., claim for £2400 due under an insurance policy. Sargood, Son and Ewen, Ltd., v. Belle Bradlee, claim for £115 12s for goods sold, etc. The following cases will be heard before a common jury of twelve: — Margaret Anniss v. the Wellington Harbour Ferries, Ltd., claim for £1500 damages (loss of life on Duco). Emma Sellstrom v. the Wellington Harbour Ferries, Ltd., claim for £750 damages ({oss of life on Duco). DIVORCE. The following petitions for dissolution of marriage have heen set down, for hearing: — Before the Judge alone:—^William Armitage v. Ruth Ahnitage ; Ethel May Lodge v. Alexander Staranore Lodge ; Sarah Calder v. Alexander Calder ; Hannah Birgitte Kirstine Anderson v. Ole Anderson; Christina Hobbs v. Leonard Alexander Hobbs ; Isabel May Matheson Mackay v. George William Lincoln Mackay: Emily Victoria Firth v. Arthur William George Firth; James M'Grath v. Annie M'Grath; Agnes Mary Dawson Welsh v. Ralph Hertfert Dawsoa Welsh. Before a common jury of twelve: Annie / Gamble v. Robert Gamble; Charles Edwin Major v. Julia Sarah Major (judicial separation) ; Julia Sarah Major v. Charles Edwin Major (judicial separation).
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19100513.2.26
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXIX, Issue 112, 13 May 1910, Page 3
Word Count
342SUPREME COURT. Evening Post, Volume LXXIX, Issue 112, 13 May 1910, Page 3
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.