Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ONLY ONE DRAWBACK. PROHIBITION FOR WORKING MEN.

Nothing but rank ingratitude could account tor the decision of the American Federation of Labour to carry oh a campaign in New York for the "legalising of light wines and beers as beverages, in the interests of health, temperance, morality and law enforcement .*' When the Eighteenth Amendment hung in the balance the greatest employers of labour contributed liberally to the cause of taking beer away from the workman for his own good. Having laid in private stocks of considerable magnitude, they faced tl e prospect of dry and sober years for employees with immense enthusiasm. A sober employee works harder, more steadily, and brings in larger profits. The attitude of the employers was purely benevolent. It remains benevolent tu this day. There appears but one drawback .so far. The working men don't like it.. They fail to appreciate the anxiety for their welfare, which prevents then) from buying a glass of beer after a day's work. Perhaps the American Federation of Labour," asking itself j-obeily as it must, whether it prefers individual liberty and beer, or a few cents a week extra and nothing to drink, has plumped for human liberty. II so, it can hardly be blamed.— "The World," York, June Bth, 1922. Prohibition does not prohibit the wealthy! Workers! Vote Continuance!

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DUNST19221009.2.30

Bibliographic details

Dunstan Times, Issue 3138, 9 October 1922, Page 5

Word Count
220

ONLY ONE DRAWBACK. PROHIBITION FOR WORKING MEN. Dunstan Times, Issue 3138, 9 October 1922, Page 5

ONLY ONE DRAWBACK. PROHIBITION FOR WORKING MEN. Dunstan Times, Issue 3138, 9 October 1922, Page 5