SUPREME COURT

Dominion, Volume 23, Issue 257, 26 July 1930, Page 17

SUPREME COURT

Divorce and Civil Cases A LONG LIST A long list of civil and divorce cases has been set down for hearing at the quarterly sessions of the Wellington Supreme Court, which will commence on Monday next. Civil actions number thirty-four, and include eleven claims In respect of injuries, the total sum Involved being £13.168. There are thirty-nine petitions for divorce, ot which twenty-one are on the ground of separation, nine on the ground of adultery, eight ou the ground of desertion, and one on the ground of bigamy. The list is as follows:— CIVIL CASES Before 'a Judge and Jury. Ross Alexander McCarlle and another v. A. W. Press and others, £5(18 (Injuries). Charles Gason v. George Thomas Harris and another, £2040 (injuries). Edward Nichol Sutherland v. William Tunley and another, £3OlO (Injuries). William MacGlashan .Smith and another v. Gilbert Jepson, £750 (injuries). Douglas Aitchlson v. David Richards, £604 (Injuries). Mark Davin v. Sydney- Charles Brown and another, £3lO (injuries). Arthur Hirsehorn v. Leonard Mervyn Wallace, £650 (Injuries). John Hugh Hampton v. Leo Joseph Smith, £3OO (alleged negligence). Richard Walter Richards v. Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life As surance Society, . Ltd., £lOOO (alleged slander). Joseph Edward Hopkirk and another v. Solomon Tossman, £1683 (injuries). Caroline Foote v. Henry William Hammond, £530 (injuries). Ivon Johnstone Hill v. Cunningham Carrying Co., Ltd., £286 (injuries). Before a Judge Alone. Self-Help Co-op. Grocery, Ltd. v. James Hannah and others, £2OOO (alleged breach of contract). John Fraser v. Arthur Bernard Tracery and another, for rescission ot contract. William Edward Tlmmlngs v. George Treadgold. for possession. Jane Matilda McDuffi v. Harold John Tubbs, £703 allegedly due under guaranHa°rdw!cke and Robertson. Ltd. v. Clarence Mills and another, £219 tot goods al K y B I !o P s Pl v. <i 'Mayor, councillors and citizens of Wellington, £290 (alleged “ Clarke v. Bneknall, Ltd., and others, £l5OO U“ Newman v. Eleanor Newman, P Dic C kl«°son's Limited v. Charles Edward Mullis, £205 allegedly due on promissory n °A CS b. McKinley v. New Zeal Investment Plantation. Ltd., £-18 allot, edl'v due for commission. Townsend and Paul, Ltd. v. James ®arper Mouat and others, £950 allegedly due ° n w^lh<dmlna y Seager v. Walter Patrick P ®eS ClB (?oS f0 l» Blchards v. David Richards, declaration etc Arthur Lionel .Sears and Another v. _B. Stanley Fuller and others, £oB<l for work aI NS?. d ' y ;awSng and . pl “ t h i# s^ p l |’’ r £*B2 v. Alexander Stewart Mitchell, £9B- (al le jlhn n iUchard Tonge v. Jessie Janet Edwards, £407 for work allegediy done. Olka Walker and another v. Harry Holmes, £l4BO allegedly due under pol--ICOscar Albertson Jorgensen y. Thomas Beaumont Dwan, £Bl9 allegedly due for P Maty* ami another v. Waiter Toombs Futter, £5OO refund ot deP °Peter Christopher y. Benjamin Levy, £6ll alleced breach of contract. The Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of Wellington v. Haydn Algar, injunction. Hansford and Mills Construct on C°” Ltd., v. James Harper Mouat and others, £lOOO allegedly due under guarantee. DIVORCE CASES (Before a Judge and Jury.) Eva Adeline May Pinny v. Edward Graham Pinny, alleged adultery. Cross Detition ■ Edward Graham Pinny v. Eva Adeline May, Finn, alleged adultery Edna Muriel Schneldemau v. Henry Schneideman, alleged adultery. . Charles Robert Bidwell v. Marie Thelma w k» s .k«. “‘llatll “conlunw AlUe Cullen r. Cephas John Cullen, alleged adultery. Before a Judge Alone. Defended.—James Joseph Cronin ▼. Ethel Cronin, alleged separation; Daniel Joseph Roster v. Hllarle Koster, alleged desertion; Harold John Hutchinson v. May Victoria Hutchinson, restitution of conjugal rights, Thomas George Stutter v. Slssie Jane Stutter alleged separation. Cross petition. Sis’sie Jane Stutter v. Thomas George Stutter, alleged separation; Robert Spray v. Ellen Jane Spray, alleged separation; Richard Climo v. Vera Climo, alleged separatioUndcfended.—Edmund Wellesley Reeves v. Adele Dorothea Margaret Reeves, alleged desertion; Joseph George HahcoCk v. Dorothy Mary Hancock, alleged desertion; Albert Kitchener Bartlett v. Ruby Bartlett, alleged separation; Katherine Irene Naomi Tanner v. Leslie James Tanner, alleged desertion; Gladys Lilian Stevehson v. Alexander Stevenson, alleged separation; Bernice Cecilia McVeigh v. John Miller McVeigh, alleged separation; Jane Beatrice McClew v. John McClew, alleged adultery ; Pretoria Pearl Furness v. Alexander M alter Furness, alleged separation; Frances Ethel Sinclair v. Harold Lionel Aynsley Sinclair, alleged desertion; William Beech v. Helen Etliel Beech, alleged-bigamy; William Ernest Brlgden v. Gladys Beatrice Btigden, alleged adultery; Ida Elizabeth Yewen v. Bertram Kenneth Yewen, alleged desertion; Alfred Denton v. Edith Kate Denton, alleged separation; Maude Scott v. Edward George Scott, alleged separation; Philip Joseph May v. Matilda May, restitution of conjugal rights; Ernest George Dobreceny v. Eileen Winifred Debreceny. alleged desertion; Julia Ann Callingham v. Thomas Henry Callingham, alleged adultery and desertion; Juanita Eulalie Percy v. Harry Clarence Percy, alleged separation and desertion; Emily Mabel Watkins v. James William Watkins, alleged separation ; Pearl Howard Cross 'v. Saul Cross, alleged desertion; Eric Albert Clark v. Edna Robin Clark, restitution of conjugal rights; Vivian Hector Karl Perkins v. Fanny Perkins, restitution of conjugal rights; Archie Roy Cornyns v. Doris Kathleen Cornyns, alleged separation; Madge Gwendoline North V. Wllllanr Alfred John North, alleged separation; Mabel Frances Grant v. Alph Douglas Grant, alleged separation; Mary Kellett v. Richard Charles Kellett, alleged separation: Peter Oswald v. Alice Gwendoline Oswald, alleged separation ; Angelina Florence Harvey v. Harold Dion Harvey, alleged separation; Elllnor Pearl Brown v. William Arthur Brown, alleged desertion: Elizabeth Victoria May Alexander v. Christopher Alexander, alleged separation: Walter Horace Stewart Cole v. Loveclay Alice Louisa Cole, restitution of conjugal rights.