MAGISTRATE’S COURT
BY-LAW AND CIVIL CASES
Offenders against the by-laws were dealt with by Mr. T. B. McNeil, SAI., in the Magistrate’s Court yesterday. Owing to the absence of Patrol-Officer Morrison through illness a number of cases were adjourned until February 26. For speeding Walter Cotton was convicted and ordered to pay costs; Edward Evans was fined £2; Hastings Farrington, £2; Walter Henderson, £1 10s.; Vincent Jervis, £2; Richard Teal, £2. For dangerous driving William Harvey was fined £l, Wilfred Jarman £3, John McCale £4 and Patrick Ryan £3.
For leaving a car unattended Ernest Ford, Robert Herron and Arthur Pearce were each fined £1 and costs. For parkin'- at a tram stop Thomas Norris Baker and Percy Olliver were both fined 10s. For driving without a license Ernest Evans, Daniel O’Connor and . Patrick Rvan were each fined £l. * . For failing to give way George Piaggi was fined 10s. For passing a vehicle on the wrong side Leslie James McPike was fined ±2. Failure to keep to the left cost Leo Smith 10s. CIVIL LIST Judgment for plaintiff by default was given by Mr. .T. S. Barton, S.M., in the Magistrate’s Court yesterday in the following undefended civil cases: — Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. and W. Young v. C. S. Cording, £.'io us. <>d., costs £4 17s. 6(1.: Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. and R. and E. Tinge?; and Co., Ltd. v. Nixon and Matthews. £lO Bs. Id., costs £3 10s.; Shell Co of X.Z., Ltd. v. G. Boyd, £3 6s„ costs £1 4s. Cd.: Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and the Central Bakery v. J. Hill, Is. 6d.. costs 95.; Vacuum Oil Co., Ltd. v. T. Stevenson, £l4 10s. 6d., costs £2 165.; Vacuum Oil Co. (Pty.). Ltd. v. A. Simpson, £1 Bs. 2d., costs 125.; Vacuum OB Co. (Pty.). Ltd. v. W. Scott, 175., costs 125.; E. C. Chiicott v. R. H. Crane, £B, costs £1 14s. 6d.: Hugh Hunter v. M. Bowden (separate estate), costs only, £1; George Symons v. John Edward Fitzgerald, £7o, costs £B’os.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and R. and E. Tingey and Co., Ltd. v. F. Carr, costs only. £2 135.: Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and R. and E. 1 ingey and Co.. Ltd. v. The Ritz, Ltd., costs, only. £2-135.: J. A. Redpath and Sons, Ltd. v. A. E. Wellington, £35 19s, costs £4 -s. Rd.; Mabel McKenzie v. J. Garven. £27 3s. 4d„ costs £4 2s. 6d.; State Advances Superintendent v. Charles John Foley. £3B 4s. 3d., costs £1 Hs.; State Advances Superintendent v. George McCarrison. £3J 6s. 7d„ costs £2 35.; H. Baldwin and Co., Ltd. v. R. Hatch, costs only, £1 45.; P. W. Hoult v. E. Ball and A. Ball (separate estate), £4, costs £1 12s. Cd.: John Patrick Rea v. Charles E.- Manly, £5 ns., costs £1 12s. Rd.: Inglis Bros, and CoLtd. v. H. G. Hubbard. £126 9s. Id., costs £2 10s.: Inglis Brosi and Co., Ltd. v. A. A. Elliott, £2O ls\9d., costs £1 13s : Inglis Bros, and Co., Ltd. v. Messrs. Little and Norman. £8 18s. 6d.. costs 175.: Inglis Bros, and Co., Ltd. V. J. Baty. £2O ns Idcosts £1 145.: D. F. Hall v. Gilbert J. M, Cralb, £5 155.. costs £1 14s. 6d.; Coulls. Somerville, Wilkie, Ltd. v. S. Lewis, £4 15s„ costs £1 6s. 6d.; Texas Co- Ltd. v. E. J. Bird. £l9 2s. 2d- costs £2 145.: Vacuum Oil Co. Pty.. Ltd. v. Chambers and Co- £B7 17s. sd„ costs £5 55.: Kodak (Australasia) Ptv., Ltd. v. F. B. Butlei. £l4 10s. 8d„ costs £2 145.: Dominion Securities, Ltd. v. William Dunean. £2OO. costs £9 25.; Samuels an t Kelly, Ltd. v. A. E. Cooksley. £5 14s. 7d./costs £1 10s. 6d.: Thomas Brown. Ltd. v. ‘R. Lesseil Peerless, £9B 13s. 7d- costs £2 Is.: Parsonage and Co. v. J. Wiggs. £3. costs £1 3s. 6d.; Dominion Jlnrcnntilc Agency, Ltd. and United States Rubber Co. (Aus.). Ltd. v. H. T. Avery. £l2 15s. 10d„ coats £2 IBs.; Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. and Parsons and Co, v. F. Goss, £2 Is. 10d., costs £1 3s, (Id.; Dominion M.reantile Agency, Ltd. and M. Pur ell v. J. Green ,12s. Id- costs Bs.; Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. find Laefy and CoLtd. v. T. McMillan. £2 2s„ costs £1 3s. 6d.: Dominion Mercantile Ag' ncy, Ltd. nnd C. Findlater v. T. O’Nail. £8 Ss„ costs £1 10s. 6d.: Dominion Me”cnntile Agency. Ltd. and . McMahon Motor Supplies. Ltd. V. 11. Shotlander, £6 16s. 6d- costs £1 Ils 6d.: Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. and C. Findlater v. W. Watts, costs only. Bs.: Dominion Mercantile Agency. Ltd. and Laery and Co- Ltd. v. S. Zname, £l5 Rs. Rd- coats £2 145.; Isobel Ruth Hugo v. J. A. Roseingrave. £3l 10s- costs £4 Is. Rd.: Esther Kwang Heng Li v. Hari Wi Katene, £7 13s z , costs £1 15s. Rd.
The largest collection firm In New Zealand Is the Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., of Wellington. Auckland and Christchurch, with agents iti every New Zealand town, and asso date offices throughout the world.— Ad vt.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19290213.2.54
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 22, Issue 119, 13 February 1929, Page 9
Word Count
843MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 22, Issue 119, 13 February 1929, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.