Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Sexism at play

1 Sir,—These holidays my children were given a game in which opponents have to guess the identity of a chosen character. Twenty-four “characters” are supplied; of these five are women, 19 are men and all are pink-skinned! Message: physical characteristics are the best way to describe a person; if your skin is not pink you do not count; otherwise, it is all right to be male as you have lots of choices; it is not so good to be female as, to be visible, you have to be one of a select few (five out of 24) and young and pretty; children and old people do not count either. The six children with us (ages 5 to 12) really enjoyed this game. They did not notice any of the above (until I pointed it out and we redrew the cards). Are we really so keen to pass on the values of materialism, racism, sexism, age-ism?—Yours, etc., VIVIAN HOLLAND PROCTOR. January 6, 1987.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19870110.2.109.5

Bibliographic details

Press, 10 January 1987, Page 16

Word Count
165

Sexism at play Press, 10 January 1987, Page 16

Sexism at play Press, 10 January 1987, Page 16