Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Officers and A.N.Z.U.S

Sir, — After months of seeming acquiescence you have now found some new allies. You have produced arguments with more vigour but less validity. The argument for reversing our anti-nuclear policy as promulgated by the former chiefs of staff depends first on the acceptance that the world is divided into two camps and should remain so, and second, on the acceptance of nuclear deterrence. Let us not forget that these generals are old men who have led us into military alliances involving us in disastrous conflicts such as the Vietnam War. Naturally they support such alliances. Their promotion and status have depended on it. They are pawns of a mili-tary-industrial complex which depends for its continued existence on polarisation of the world’s population. Their World War II mentality is as outmoded as is the concept of nuclear deterrence being a legitimate form of world peace. — Yours, etc., JOHN SNELGROVE. • SUSAN SNELGROVE

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19851012.2.102.3

Bibliographic details

Press, 12 October 1985, Page 18

Word Count
153

Officers and A.N.Z.U.S Press, 12 October 1985, Page 18

Officers and A.N.Z.U.S Press, 12 October 1985, Page 18