Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Swimming pool fencing

Sir, — If S. D. Knight feels that compulsory pool fencing is an unjust and unacceptable infringement of his personal freedom we suggest that he build a moat. — Yours, etc., G. J. KURTA, P. H. H. LOUGHNAN. May 22, 1984. Sir, — Does S. D. Knight drive a car with a compulsory W.0.F., wear a compulsory seat belt, and, if a Waimairi resident, drink the compulsorily floruidated water? Although too often it does not go far enough, these are just some of the ways the law protects those too young or stupid to protect themselves. S. D. Knight talks of an unjust and unacceptable infringement of personal freedom. What of the child’s right of life itself? Statistics from the Plunket Society show that almost half the total number of drownings of pre-school age children between 1978-82 were in private swimming pools. A life is a drastic price to pay for either a moment’s inattention or lack of supervision by parents. Those creating a hazard should be made responsible for it. — Yours, etc., BEVERLEY DEWAR, Springfield. May 22, 1984.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840525.2.105.8

Bibliographic details

Press, 25 May 1984, Page 12

Word Count
179

Swimming pool fencing Press, 25 May 1984, Page 12

Swimming pool fencing Press, 25 May 1984, Page 12