Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Jazz and the Soviet Union

Sir,—My quarrel with A. K. Grant’s review of Professor Starr’s book is contained in its last two paragraphs where he quotes Professor Starr’s comparison of the popular cultures of the United States and the Soviet Union to the latter’s detriment, and the Russian monolith’s facade “becoming pitted and eroded by the strains of jazz

...” The United States is also a monolith — of plutocracy — but I doubt that Professor Starr would dare to suggest that its facade is becoming pitted and eroded by the strains of jazz. Jazz has become a sacred cow, as the sensitiveness of its admirers to criticism shows. Jazz is not the only “music of the people” and if Leonard Wilcox (April 23) would argue that jazz has an egalitarian and Utopian content, is he unaware that Utopianism is anathema to Marxism? Killjoy or not, ridiculously pretentious claims made on behalf of jazz need to be derided. — Yours, etc., M. CREEL. April 24, 1984. [This correspondence is now closed.—Editor.]

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840426.2.91.10

Bibliographic details

Press, 26 April 1984, Page 20

Word Count
167

Jazz and the Soviet Union Press, 26 April 1984, Page 20

Jazz and the Soviet Union Press, 26 April 1984, Page 20