Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Non-agression pacts

Sir,-In reply to M. T. Moore’s letter (February 23\ my submission of the number of countries available to sign the pact will stand up to examination. Mr Moore is indulging in legal hair-splitting when he mentions a discrepancy of 48 nations. He knows that these were not sovereign states with power to sign of. their free will. They were colonies and protectorates of the imperial powers (eg. Nigeria. Tunisia, etc.). Elven for India in 1939, war was declared by

the Viceroy in Germany, not by the Indian Parliament in New Delhi which was well on the way to selfgovernment. For this reason, the Congress Party refused for several years to take its place in the legislature. Incidentally, the Kellog Pact is still in force, not having been revoked, so what use are any more pacts? — Yours, etc., H. F. NEWMAN. February 27, 1983.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830307.2.111.11

Bibliographic details

Press, 7 March 1983, Page 20

Word Count
145

Non-agression pacts Press, 7 March 1983, Page 20

Non-agression pacts Press, 7 March 1983, Page 20